Countries citing papers authored by Richard J. Coley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard J. Coley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard J. Coley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard J. Coley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard J. Coley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard J. Coley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard J. Coley. The network helps show where Richard J. Coley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard J. Coley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard J. Coley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard J. Coley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Richard J. Coley. Richard J. Coley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Coley, Richard J., et al.. (2015). America's Skills Challenge: Millennials and the Future..40 indexed citations
2.
Coley, Richard J., et al.. (2012). Fault Lines in Our Democracy: Civic Knowledge, Voting Behavior, and Civic Engagement in the United States. Highlights..10 indexed citations
3.
Ackerman, Debra J. & Richard J. Coley. (2012). State Pre-K Assessment Policies: Issues and Status. Policy Information Report..10 indexed citations
4.
Barton, Paul E. & Richard J. Coley. (2011). The Mission of the High School: A New Consensus of the Purposes of Public Education? Policy Information Perspective..1 indexed citations
5.
Barton, Paul E. & Richard J. Coley. (2010). The Black-White Achievement Gap: When Progress Stopped. Policy Information Report..30 indexed citations
6.
Braun, Henry, Richard J. Coley, Jia Yue, & Catherine Trapani. (2009). Exploring What Works in Science Instruction: A Look at the Eighth-Grade Science Classroom. Policy Information Report..10 indexed citations
7.
Barton, Paul E. & Richard J. Coley. (2009). Parsing the Achievement Gap II. Policy Information Report..36 indexed citations
8.
Coley, Richard J., et al.. (2008). Access to Success:Patterns of Advanced Placement Participation in U.S. High Schools. Policy Information Report..11 indexed citations
9.
Barton, Paul E. & Richard J. Coley. (2008). Windows on Achievement and Inequality. Policy Information Report..6 indexed citations
10.
Barton, Paul E. & Richard J. Coley. (2007). The Family: America's Smallest School. Policy Information Report..23 indexed citations
11.
Coley, Richard J. & Paul E. Barton. (2006). Locked Up and Locked Out: An Educational Perspective on the U.S. Prison Population. Policy Information Report..17 indexed citations
Coley, Richard J., et al.. (1999). How Teachers Compare: The Prose, Document, and Quantitative Skills of America's Teachers. Policy Information Report..4 indexed citations
14.
Coley, Richard J., et al.. (1997). Computers and Classrooms: The Status of Technology in U.S. Schools. Policy Information Report..58 indexed citations
15.
Barton, Paul E. & Richard J. Coley. (1996). Captive Students: Education and Training in America's Prisons. Policy Information Report..5 indexed citations
Coley, Richard J. & Margaret E. Goertz. (1990). Characteristics of Minority NTE Test-Takers. Teacher Programs Council Report No. 91-1.. 7. Comunicazioni 592–6.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.