Richard G. Hibbert
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Oncology top 10%
- Immunology
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Cell Biology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Titia K. SixmaAnding HuangRolf BoelensMatthias MannAnastassis PerrakisDene R. LittlerNicola CrosettoMagda Bienko
- Topics
- DNA Repair Mechanisms (8 papers)Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (8 papers)Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Molecular BiologyImmunologyOncology
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesNucleic Acids ResearchJournal of Biological Chemistry
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Richard G. Hibbert
20 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- Molecular Biology 878
- Oncology 250
- Immunology 212
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 156
- Cell Biology 129
Countries citing papers authored by Richard G. Hibbert
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard G. Hibbert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard G. Hibbert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard G. Hibbert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard G. Hibbert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard G. Hibbert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard G. Hibbert. The network helps show where Richard G. Hibbert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard G. Hibbert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard G. Hibbert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard G. Hibbert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard G. Hibbert. Richard G. Hibbert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 17 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 40 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 87 | |
| 9 | 35 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 110 | |
| 12 | 133 | |
| 13 | 118 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 10 | |
| 16 | 56 | |
| 17 | 81 | |
| 18 | 110 | |
| 19 | 23 | |
| 20 | 123 |
About Richard G. Hibbert
Richard G. Hibbert is a scholar working on Aging, Oncology and Physiology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include DNA Repair Mechanisms (8 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (8 papers) and Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (878 citations), Immunology (212 citations) and Oncology (250 citations). Richard G. Hibbert has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Titia K. Sixma, Anding Huang, Rolf Boelens, Matthias Mann, Anastassis Perrakis, Dene R. Littler, Nicola Crosetto, Magda Bienko, Ivan Đikić and James M. McDonnell. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nucleic Acids Research and Journal of Biological Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.