Ram Neta

1.7k citations
47 papers · 724 indexed · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Ram Neta

43 papers receiving 623 citations

Peers

Ram Neta
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Philosophy 657
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 447
  • History and Philosophy of Science 128
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 270
  • Family Practice 17
Replace Alan Millar with:
Alan Millar United Kingdom
Anthony Brueckner United States
Clayton Littlejohn United Kingdom
Sven Bernecker United States
Jane Friedman United States
Declan Smithies United States
Michael R. DePaul United States
Mikkel Gerken Denmark
Juan Comesaña United States
Stephen Hetherington Australia
Ram Neta relative to Alan Millar United Kingdom Alan Millar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Alan Millar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ram Neta

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ram Neta's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ram Neta with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ram Neta more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ram Neta

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ram Neta. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ram Neta. The network helps show where Ram Neta may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Ram Neta, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ram Neta Line = papers co-authored together Ram Neta links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004110
2 200772
3 200949
4 200843
5 200242
6 200640
7 200339
8 200733
9 201332
10 201931
11
Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic
200721
12 200721
13 200920
14 200616
15 200312
16 200512
17 201111
18 20199
19 20189
20 20068

About Ram Neta

Ram Neta is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 47 papers that have together received 724 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (39 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (31 papers), Free Will and Agency (10 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (6 papers), Theology and Philosophy of Evil (5 papers), Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge (3 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (657 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (447 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (128 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (270 citations) and Family Practice (17 citations). Ram Neta has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Guy Rohrbaugh, Duncan Pritchard, Brian Weatherson, Stephen Schiffer, Louis deRosset, Stewart Cohen, Timothy Williamson, James Pryor, Geoffrey Lee and Declan Smithies. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Philosophical Studies, Philosophical Issues, Synthese and The Philosophical Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact