Clayton Littlejohn
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence
- Co-authors
- John TurriMaria Lasonen‐AarnioMark SchroederAlan MillarAsbjørn Steglich‐PetersenAndrew ReisnerDuncan PritchardNishi Shah
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (41 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (30 papers)Free Will and Agency (13 papers)
- Journals
- The Journal of PhilosophyPhilosophy and Phenomenological ResearchThe Philosophical Quarterly
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Clayton Littlejohn
54 papers receiving 685 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Philosophy 710
- Cognitive Neuroscience 360
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 345
- Sociology and Political Science 129
- Artificial Intelligence 89
Countries citing papers authored by Clayton Littlejohn
This map shows the geographic impact of Clayton Littlejohn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Clayton Littlejohn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Clayton Littlejohn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Clayton Littlejohn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Clayton Littlejohn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Clayton Littlejohn. The network helps show where Clayton Littlejohn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Clayton Littlejohn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Clayton Littlejohn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Clayton Littlejohn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Clayton Littlejohn. Clayton Littlejohn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 59 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | A Plea for Epistemic Excuses | 22 |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | A Note Concerning Conciliationism and Self-Defeat: A Reply to Matheson | 2 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Disagreement and Defeat | 8 |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | ‘Ought’, ‘Can’, and Practical Reasons | 7 |
| 19 | 20 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Clayton Littlejohn
Clayton Littlejohn is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 57 papers that have together received 779 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (41 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (30 papers) and Free Will and Agency (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (710 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (345 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (360 citations). Clayton Littlejohn has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Turri, Maria Lasonen‐Aarnio, Mark Schroeder, Alan Millar, Asbjørn Steglich‐Petersen, Andrew Reisner, Duncan Pritchard, Nishi Shah, Adam Leite and Andrew Reisner. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and The Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.