Louis deRosset

639 citations
19 papers · 230 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers)Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers)

In The Last Decade

Louis deRosset

19 papers receiving 215 citations

Peers

Louis deRosset
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 203
  • Philosophy 157
  • History and Philosophy of Science 88
  • Artificial Intelligence 43
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 31
Replace Jon Erling Litland with:
Jon Erling Litland United States
Stephan Leuenberger United Kingdom
Alexander Skiles Switzerland
Bradley Armour‐Garb United States
Brian Rabern United Kingdom
Josh Dever United States
Kelly Trogdon United States
David Liebesman Canada
Patrick Greenough United Kingdom
Thomas Sattig Germany
Louis deRosset relative to Jon Erling Litland United States Jon Erling Litland's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jon Erling Litland · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Louis deRosset

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Louis deRosset's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louis deRosset with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louis deRosset more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Louis deRosset

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louis deRosset. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louis deRosset. The network helps show where Louis deRosset may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louis deRosset

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louis deRosset. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louis deRosset based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louis deRosset. Louis deRosset is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 4
3 9
4 5
5 3
6 8
7 2
8 20
9 20
10 18
11 2
12 6
13 14
14 64
15 3
16 7
17 9
18
Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic
21
19 14

About Louis deRosset

Louis deRosset is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Philosophy, having authored 19 papers that have together received 230 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (17 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers) and Philosophy and History of Science (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (88 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (203 citations) and Philosophy (157 citations). Louis deRosset has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Guy Rohrbaugh, Kit Fine, Øystein Linnebo, Elizabeth Harman, Brian Weatherson, Geoffrey Lee, Declan Smithies, Ram Neta, Stephen Schiffer and Ralph Wedgwood. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026