Declan Smithies

1.7k citations
27 papers · 628 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Declan Smithies

24 papers receiving 554 citations

Peers

Declan Smithies
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
  • Philosophy 520
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 363
  • History and Philosophy of Science 107
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 319
  • General Decision Sciences 9
Replace Susanna Siegel with:
Susanna Siegel United States
Elijah Chudnoff United States
Ram Neta United States
John Bengson United States
Paul Snowdon United Kingdom
Juan Comesaña United States
Max Deutsch Hong Kong
Conor McHugh United Kingdom
Annalisa Coliva United States
Jane Heal United Kingdom
Declan Smithies relative to Susanna Siegel United States Susanna Siegel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Susanna Siegel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Declan Smithies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Declan Smithies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Declan Smithies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Declan Smithies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Declan Smithies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Declan Smithies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Declan Smithies. The network helps show where Declan Smithies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 17 scholars most cited alongside Declan Smithies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Declan Smithies Line = papers co-authored together Declan Smithies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2011104
2 201190
3 201974
4 201565
5 201265
6 201136
7 201134
8 201331
9 201121
10
Basic Justification and the Moorean Response to the Skeptic
200721
11 201218
12 201914
13 20169
14 20138
15 20138
16 20156
17 20225
18
Review of Duncan Pritchard, Epistemological Disjunctivism
20134
19 20154
20 20193

About Declan Smithies

Declan Smithies is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, History and Philosophy of Science and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 27 papers that have together received 628 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (22 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (14 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (9 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (4 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (2 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (2 papers), Misinformation and Its Impacts (2 papers) and Free Will and Agency (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (520 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (363 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (107 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (319 citations) and General Decision Sciences (9 citations). Declan Smithies has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Stoljar, Richard J. Samuels, Brian Weatherson, Stephen Schiffer, Stewart Cohen, Louis deRosset, Timothy Williamson, James Pryor, Geoffrey Lee and John Hawthorne. Their work appears in journals such as Analytic Philosophy, Synthese, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Analysis and Philosophical Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact