Philosophical Issues

650 papers and 7.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 650 papers published in Philosophical Issues in the last decades have received a total of 7.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Philosophical Issues usually cover Philosophy (500 papers), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (333 papers) and Cognitive Neuroscience (222 papers) specifically the topics of Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (434 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (327 papers) and Free Will and Agency (149 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Philosophical Issues are James Pryor, Ned Block, Paul Boghossian, Philip Pettit, Allan Gibbard, David Rosenthal, Jaegwon Kim, Stewart Cohen, Sharon Street and Jason Stanley.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Philosophical Issues

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Philosophical Issues. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Philosophical Issues.

Countries where authors publish in Philosophical Issues

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Philosophical Issues. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Philosophical Issues with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philosophical Issues more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025