R. T. Pithers
- Education top 1%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Stress and Burnout Research (4 papers)Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (3 papers)Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Vocational BehaviorBritish Journal of Educational PsychologyLearning and Motivation
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomRussia
In The Last Decade
R. T. Pithers
17 papers receiving 820 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- Education 621
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 229
- Social Psychology 221
- General Health Professions 117
- Clinical Psychology 92
Countries citing papers authored by R. T. Pithers
This map shows the geographic impact of R. T. Pithers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. T. Pithers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. T. Pithers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. T. Pithers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. T. Pithers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. T. Pithers. The network helps show where R. T. Pithers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. T. Pithers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. T. Pithers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. T. Pithers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. T. Pithers. R. T. Pithers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gender and age as moderators of the relationship between the efficacy of vocational teachers' personal resources and strain | 3 |
| 2 | 66 | |
| 3 | 9 | |
| 4 | Field dependence-field independence and vocational teachers | 1 |
| 5 | Critical thinking in education: a reviewbreakdown → | 548 |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 115 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 70 | |
| 12 | 72 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 15 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1 |
About R. T. Pithers
R. T. Pithers is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 969 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Stress and Burnout Research (4 papers), Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences (3 papers) and Workplace Health and Well-being (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Education (621 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (229 citations) and Social Psychology (221 citations). R. T. Pithers has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Rebecca Soden, Gerard J. Fogarty, James A. Athanasou and Ian R. Cornford. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vocational Behavior, British Journal of Educational Psychology and Learning and Motivation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.