R. Frankhuizen
- Analytical Chemistry top 2%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science
- Co-authors
- R.W. KranenNicolaas M. FaberG.H. GeesinkM.A. GerritzenMaria BremerW.H.A.M. van den BroekJ.W.M. MerksWilfried Klein
- Topics
- Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers)Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers)Identification and Quantification in Food (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsAustriaHungary
In The Last Decade
R. Frankhuizen
13 papers receiving 348 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 46
- Analytical Chemistry 229
- Animal Science and Zoology 212
- Biomedical Engineering 139
- Molecular Biology 96
- Food Science 69
Countries citing papers authored by R. Frankhuizen
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Frankhuizen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Frankhuizen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Frankhuizen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Frankhuizen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Frankhuizen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Frankhuizen. The network helps show where R. Frankhuizen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Frankhuizen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Frankhuizen. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Frankhuizen based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Frankhuizen. R. Frankhuizen is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 38 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 36 | |
| 6 | 103 | |
| 7 | 116 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | Estimation of mould biomass in paprika powder by using near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) | 1 |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | Non-destructive determination of moisture content of fresh mushrooms by near infrared (NIR) spectroscopy | 2 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Determination of major and minor constituents in milk powders and cheese by near infra-red reflectance spectroscopy | 3 |
About R. Frankhuizen
R. Frankhuizen is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Animal Science and Zoology and Biophysics, having authored 13 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (6 papers), Meat and Animal Product Quality (5 papers) and Identification and Quantification in Food (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (229 citations), Animal Science and Zoology (212 citations) and Biophysics (45 citations). R. Frankhuizen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and Hungary. Frequent co-authors include R.W. Kranen, Nicolaas M. Faber, G.H. Geesink, M.A. Gerritzen, Maria Bremer, W.H.A.M. van den Broek, J.W.M. Merks, Wilfried Klein, E. Lambooij and A.H. Hoving-Bolink. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Meat Science and International Dairy Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.