This map shows the geographic impact of PM Broadfoot's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by PM Broadfoot with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PM Broadfoot more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by PM Broadfoot. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by PM Broadfoot. The network helps show where PM Broadfoot may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of PM Broadfoot
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of PM Broadfoot.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of PM Broadfoot based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with PM Broadfoot. PM Broadfoot is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Broadfoot, PM, et al.. (2009). ‘Valutazione per L’apprendimento nella scuola?’. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).3 indexed citations
2.
Broadfoot, PM, et al.. (2004). Learning power: a practitioners guide and training materials. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).1 indexed citations
3.
Speedy, Jane, et al.. (2003). Learning and Teaching where Worldviews Meet.18 indexed citations
4.
Broadfoot, PM, et al.. (2002). Testing, Motivation and Learning. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).56 indexed citations
5.
Broadfoot, PM. (2002). Review: The Freinet Movements of France, Italy and Germany, 1920-2000. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 395–396.1 indexed citations
6.
Broadfoot, PM, et al.. (2001). Pupil Assessment and Classroom Culture: A Comparative Study of the Language of Assessment in England and France. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 41–63.7 indexed citations
7.
McNess, EM, PM Broadfoot, & MJ Osborn. (2001). British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of Leeds.8 indexed citations
8.
Broadfoot, PM, et al.. (2000). Promoting Quality in Learning: Does England Have the Answer? Findings from the Quest project. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).13 indexed citations
9.
Broadfoot, PM. (1999). Learning From Comparing: the Uses and Abuses of Comparative Education Research.
10.
Broadfoot, PM, et al.. (1999). The changing discourse of assessment policy: the case of English primary education. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).14 indexed citations
Pollard, A, et al.. (1993). Balancing priorities: children and the curriculum in the nineties. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 31–48.5 indexed citations
14.
Broadfoot, PM. (1993). Curriculum Reform: Assessment in Question.17 indexed citations
15.
Osborn, MJ & PM Broadfoot. (1992). A Lesson in Progress? French and English Classrooms Compared. Oxford Review of Education. 3–15.1 indexed citations
16.
Broadfoot, PM. (1992). Assessment and Curriculum Reform.4 indexed citations
17.
Broadfoot, PM & MJ Osborn. (1992). Becoming and Being a Teacher. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).1 indexed citations
18.
Broadfoot, PM, et al.. (1991). The Conduct and Effectiveness of Primary School Assessment.. Journal of Curriculum Studies.1 indexed citations
19.
Osborn, MJ & PM Broadfoot. (1990). French Lessons: Some International Comparisons of Teachers' Classroom Practice. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).2 indexed citations
20.
Osborn, MJ, et al.. (1988). Teachers' Conceptions of their Professional Responsibility: The Role of Comparative Classroom Studies. Bristol Research (University of Bristol). 15. 46–57.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.