Pina Tarricone

16 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Pina Tarricone
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • Education 162
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 121
  • Social Psychology 62
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 34
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
Replace María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano with:
María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano Spain
Virpi Slotte Finland
María Luisa Sanz de Acedo Lizárraga Spain
Leonid Grebennikov Australia
Katerina Bohle Carbonell Netherlands
Saemah Rahman Malaysia
Karin Scager Netherlands
Jan Nijhuis Netherlands
Ian R. Cornford Australia
Ahmet Doğanay Türkiye
Pina Tarricone relative to María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano Spain María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
María Teresa Sanz de Acedo Baquedano · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pina Tarricone

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pina Tarricone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pina Tarricone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pina Tarricone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pina Tarricone

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pina Tarricone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pina Tarricone. The network helps show where Pina Tarricone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pina Tarricone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pina Tarricone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pina Tarricone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pina Tarricone. Pina Tarricone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 3
2 3
3
Measuring what matters: Insights on the value of Whole Child Development
2
4
What does the research tell us about leadership and international education
0
5 0
6 1
7 8
8 1
9 28
10
Digitizing Practical Production Work for High-Stakes Assessments.
4
11 4
12 2
13 1
14 144
15
Skills Needed for Managing Multimedia Development – Invisible or Visible?
0
16
Teachers and the Temporal
1
17 62
18
Successful teamwork:A case study.
47
19
Does emotional intelligence affect successful teamwork
37

About Pina Tarricone

Pina Tarricone is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 348 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Emotional Intelligence and Performance (3 papers), Open Education and E-Learning (2 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (121 citations), Education (162 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (34 citations). Pina Tarricone has collaborated with scholars based in Australia. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Luca, C. Paul Newhouse, David Moshman, Ian Teo, Paul Newhouse, Martin Cooper and Kylie Hillman. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal of Paramedicine, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology and International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026