Philip J. Auter
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Communication top 2%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Marketing top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philip PalmgreenDonald M. DavisRoy L. MoorePeter ManningDouglas A. BoydMichael HannaNaila Hamdy
- Topics
- Media Studies and Communication (9 papers)Media Influence and Health (7 papers)Media, Gender, and Advertising (6 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic MediaCommunication Research ReportsInternational Journal of Mobile Communications
- Partner nations
- United StatesEgyptAustralia
In The Last Decade
Philip J. Auter
16 papers receiving 476 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Sociology and Political Science 292
- Literature and Literary Theory 274
- Communication 209
- Gender Studies 179
- Marketing 89
Countries citing papers authored by Philip J. Auter
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip J. Auter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip J. Auter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip J. Auter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip J. Auter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip J. Auter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip J. Auter. The network helps show where Philip J. Auter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip J. Auter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip J. Auter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip J. Auter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip J. Auter. Philip J. Auter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 24 | |
| 5 | A Cultural Perspective: A Survey of U.S. and Egyptian Students Regarding Their Perceptions of People with Disabilities* | 1 |
| 6 | Presidential Candidate Preference Based on Issue Salience and Homophily: A Cross-Cultural Analysis | 1 |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | The Interactive Nature of Computer-Mediated Communication | 12 |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 81 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | Meeting the Needs of Multiple Audiences: An Examination of the Aljazeera and English Aljazeera Websites from the Public Relations Perspective | 2 |
| 13 | 159 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 131 | |
| 19 | 47 |
About Philip J. Auter
Philip J. Auter is a scholar working on Communication, Literature and Literary Theory and Gender Studies, having authored 19 papers that have together received 551 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (9 papers), Media Influence and Health (7 papers) and Media, Gender, and Advertising (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (209 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (274 citations) and Gender Studies (179 citations). Philip J. Auter has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Egypt and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Philip Palmgreen, Donald M. Davis, Roy L. Moore, Peter Manning, Douglas A. Boyd, Michael Hanna and Naila Hamdy. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, Communication Research Reports and International Journal of Mobile Communications.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.