Journalism & Mass Communication QuarterlyUnited States
Communication ResearchUnited States
Human Communication ResearchUnited States
Communication MonographsUnited States
New Media & SocietyUnited States
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social NetworkingUnited States
Public Relations ReviewUnited States
Organization StudiesUnited Kingdom
Media Culture & SocietyUnited Kingdom
Information Communication & SocietyUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · 1×
×1.545.9kSPS
×1.735.4kCOMMU
×0.33.3kLLT
×0.78.1kGS
×0.95.9kEDUCA
Citations per year, relative to Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media
This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.