Philip Greven
Impact in
- History top 0.5%
- Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes
- General Psychology top 10%
Papers in
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis 2
-
- Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies 2
- Co-authors
- James H. CassedyCharles L. CohenJohn DemosWilliam R. GarrettKenneth A. LockridgeNorman FieringJohn J. WatersLaurel Thatcher Ulrich
- Journals
- Journal of American History (6 papers)The William and Mary Quarterly (6 papers)The American Historical Review (4 papers)The Journal of Interdisciplinary History (2 papers)History and Theory (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsGermany
In The Last Decade
Philip Greven
26 papers receiving 494 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
- History 165
- General Psychology 12
- Anthropology 73
- Health 64
- Marketing 62
Countries citing papers authored by Philip Greven
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Greven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Greven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Greven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Greven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Greven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Greven. The network helps show where Philip Greven may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 22 scholars most cited alongside Philip Greven, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1992 | 105 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 27 | |
| 3 | 1991 | 38 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 54 | |
| 5 | 1982 | 28 | |
| 6 | 1981 | 20 | |
| 7 | 1979 | 78 | |
| 8 | 1979 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1979 | 4 | |
| 10 | 1977 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1974 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1973 | 4 | |
| 13 | 1972 | 7 | |
| 14 | 1972 | 11 | |
| 15 | 1971 | 15 | |
| 16 | 1971 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1970 | 81 | |
| 18 | 1970 | 143 | |
| 19 | 1970 | 12 | |
| 20 | 1966 | 11 |
About Philip Greven
Philip Greven is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law and Marketing, having authored 28 papers that have together received 761 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (8 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (5 papers), American Environmental and Regional History (4 papers), American History and Culture (3 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (2 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers), Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies (2 papers) and Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (165 citations), General Psychology (12 citations), Anthropology (73 citations), Health (64 citations) and Marketing (62 citations). Philip Greven has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include James H. Cassedy, Charles L. Cohen, John Demos, William R. Garrett, Kenneth A. Lockridge, Norman Fiering, John J. Waters, Laurel Thatcher Ulrich, David G. Allen and David Leverenz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The William and Mary Quarterly, The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and History and Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.