G. J. Barker-Benfield
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 1%
- Literature and Literary Theory top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Tamara Κ. HarevenJulie EllisonMichael GordonLinda GordonJohn S. HallerRobin M. HallerRandolph TrumbachDorothy C. Wertz
- Topics
- Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (5 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers)Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers)
- Journals
- Contemporary Sociology A Journal of ReviewsThe American Historical ReviewJournal of American History
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
G. J. Barker-Benfield
15 papers receiving 311 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Sociology and Political Science 209
- History 138
- Literature and Literary Theory 98
- Gender Studies 81
- Demography 61
Countries citing papers authored by G. J. Barker-Benfield
This map shows the geographic impact of G. J. Barker-Benfield's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. J. Barker-Benfield with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. J. Barker-Benfield more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. J. Barker-Benfield
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. J. Barker-Benfield. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. J. Barker-Benfield. The network helps show where G. J. Barker-Benfield may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. J. Barker-Benfield
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. J. Barker-Benfield. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. J. Barker-Benfield based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. J. Barker-Benfield. G. J. Barker-Benfield is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 107 | |
| 7 | 15 | |
| 8 | 12 | |
| 9 | 38 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Portraits of American women | 1 |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | 24 | |
| 15 | Mary Wollstonecraft's depression and diagnosis: the relation between sensibility and women's susceptibility to nervous disorders. | 2 |
| 16 | A woman with a purpose. The diaries of Elizabeth Smith 1872–1884 | 0 |
| 17 | 132 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 44 | |
| 20 | 92 |
About G. J. Barker-Benfield
G. J. Barker-Benfield is a scholar working on History, Religious studies and Anthropology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 526 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Gender and Feminism Studies (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers) and Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (138 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (98 citations) and Gender Studies (81 citations). G. J. Barker-Benfield has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Tamara Κ. Hareven, Julie Ellison, Michael Gordon, Linda Gordon, John S. Haller, Robin M. Haller, Randolph Trumbach, Dorothy C. Wertz and Catherine Clinton. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, The American Historical Review and Journal of American History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.