History and Theory

1.7k papers and 31.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.7k papers published in History and Theory in the last decades have received a total of 31.8k indexed citations. Papers published in History and Theory usually cover Sociology and Political Science (444 papers), History (367 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (229 papers) specifically the topics of Philosophy, History, and Historiography (189 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (66 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (57 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History and Theory are Neil J. Smelser, Mary Gluck, Anthony Giddens, Hayden V. White, Quentin Skinner, Wulf Kansteiner, Dominick LaCapra, Monique Scheer, Alan Macfarlane and Lawrence Stone.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History and Theory

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History and Theory. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History and Theory.

Countries where authors publish in History and Theory

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History and Theory. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History and Theory with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History and Theory more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025