Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Lasch
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Lasch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Lasch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Lasch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Lasch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Lasch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Lasch. The network helps show where Christopher Lasch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Lasch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Lasch.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Lasch based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Lasch. Christopher Lasch is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lasch, Christopher, et al.. (2017). Understanding 'Sanctuary Cities'. Boston College law review.14 indexed citations
2.
Lai, Annie & Christopher Lasch. (2017). Crimmigration Resistance and the Case of Sanctuary City Defunding. SSRN Electronic Journal.5 indexed citations
3.
Lasch, Christopher. (2016). What’s Wrong with the Right?. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).
Lasch, Christopher. (2014). "Crimmigration" and the Right to Counsel at the Border between Civil and Criminal Proceedings. Iowa law review. 99(5). 2131.1 indexed citations
Brown, Norman O. & Christopher Lasch. (2012). Life Against Death: The Psychoanalytical Meaning of History. Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University).62 indexed citations
8.
Castoriadis, Cornélius, et al.. (2012). La culture de l'égoïsme.1 indexed citations
9.
Lasch, Christopher. (2012). Federal Immigration Detainers After Arizona v. United States. Loyola of Los Angeles law review. 46(2). 629.2 indexed citations
10.
Lasch, Christopher. (2008). Enforcing the Limits of the Executive's Authority to Issue Immigration Detainers. William Mitchell law review. 35(1). 13.3 indexed citations
11.
Lasch, Christopher & F. Joly. (2006). Le seul et vrai paradis : une histoire de l'idéologie du progrès et de ses critiques. Flammarion eBooks.
12.
Lasch, Christopher. (1999). La cultura del narcisismo. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).58 indexed citations
13.
Lasch, Christopher. (1990). Optimism or Hope? The Ethic of Abundance and the Ethic of Limits. 10(2). 1.
14.
Lasch, Christopher. (1986). Consumo, narcisismo y cultura de masas. 7(38). 16–29.
15.
Lasch, Christopher. (1985). "Excellence" in Education: Old Refrain or New Departure?.. 3(1). 1–12.55 indexed citations
16.
Lasch, Christopher, et al.. (1984). Refugio en un mundo despiadado: la familia, ¿santuario o institución asediada?.2 indexed citations
Lasch, Christopher. (1975). The Family and History.. New York review of books/The New York review of books.12 indexed citations
20.
Alperovitz, Gar & Christopher Lasch. (1970). Cold war essays.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.