Philip Garner

122 total papers · 465 total citations
44 papers, 260 citations indexed

About

Philip Garner is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Garner has authored 44 papers receiving a total of 260 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 14 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 9 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in Philip Garner's work include Educational and Psychological Assessments (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers) and Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (8 papers). Philip Garner is often cited by papers focused on Educational and Psychological Assessments (12 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (8 papers) and Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (8 papers). Philip Garner collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Philip Garner's co-authors include John Dwyfor Davies, Harry Daniels, Konstantina Poursanidou, Alan R. Watson, David Preece, Richard Rose, Alan J. Watson, Peter Clough, Jane Murray and Tania Aspland and has published in prestigious journals such as British Educational Research Journal, Children & Society and Early Child Development and Care.

In The Last Decade

Philip Garner

37 papers receiving 194 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Philip Garner 165 68 55 48 42 44 260
Tanja Vehkakoski 144 0.9× 96 1.4× 58 1.1× 65 1.4× 41 1.0× 38 311
Matia Finn‐Stevenson 181 1.1× 110 1.6× 36 0.7× 44 0.9× 41 1.0× 32 299
Jane Payler 158 1.0× 50 0.7× 41 0.7× 89 1.9× 18 0.4× 27 258
Penny Lacey 180 1.1× 90 1.3× 81 1.5× 33 0.7× 69 1.6× 31 287
Jude MacArthur 184 1.1× 75 1.1× 35 0.6× 77 1.6× 65 1.5× 24 257
Anne Lillvist 163 1.0× 141 2.1× 65 1.2× 55 1.1× 16 0.4× 24 314
Jan Deans 217 1.3× 81 1.2× 49 0.9× 38 0.8× 20 0.5× 42 302
Elena Savina 150 0.9× 131 1.9× 92 1.7× 26 0.5× 18 0.4× 33 324
Kym Macfarlane 185 1.1× 64 0.9× 29 0.5× 56 1.2× 14 0.3× 34 283
John K. McNamara 143 0.9× 82 1.2× 111 2.0× 17 0.4× 24 0.6× 28 292

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Garner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Garner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Garner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Garner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Garner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Garner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Garner. The network helps show where Philip Garner may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Garner

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Garner. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Garner based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Garner. Philip Garner is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026