Philip C. Almond
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Religious studies top 2%
- History top 5%
- Co-authors
- James B. McSwainJill RuberyIan ClarkPatrick GunnigleHartmut WächterAnthony FernerTony EdwardsTrevor Colling
- Topics
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (8 papers)Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers)Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers)
- Cited by
- Religious studiesPhilosophyClassics
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIreland
In The Last Decade
Philip C. Almond
40 papers receiving 271 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Sociology and Political Science 144
- Philosophy 120
- Political Science and International Relations 73
- Religious studies 70
- History 56
Countries citing papers authored by Philip C. Almond
This map shows the geographic impact of Philip C. Almond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip C. Almond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip C. Almond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Philip C. Almond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip C. Almond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip C. Almond. The network helps show where Philip C. Almond may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip C. Almond
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip C. Almond. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip C. Almond based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip C. Almond. Philip C. Almond is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Afterlife: A History of Life After Death | 3 |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Unraveling Home and Host Country Effects: An Investigation of the HR Policies of an American Multinational in Four European Countries | 5 |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 26 | |
| 9 | 19 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Heretic and Hero: Muhammad and the Victorians | 9 |
| 14 | 112 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Mystical experience and religious doctrine | 9 |
| 20 | 0 |
About Philip C. Almond
Philip C. Almond is a scholar working on Public Administration, Religious studies and Philosophy, having authored 50 papers that have together received 372 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (8 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (6 papers) and Indian and Buddhist Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (70 citations), Philosophy (120 citations) and Classics (22 citations). Philip C. Almond has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include James B. McSwain, Jill Rubery, Ian Clark, Patrick Gunnigle, Hartmut Wächter, Anthony Ferner, Tony Edwards, Trevor Colling, Javier Quintanilla and Michael Müller‐Camen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Management Studies, Work Employment and Society and History of European Ideas.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.