History of European Ideas

2.5k papers and 14.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.5k papers published in History of European Ideas in the last decades have received a total of 14.9k indexed citations. Papers published in History of European Ideas usually cover Political Science and International Relations (720 papers), History (609 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (584 papers) specifically the topics of American Constitutional Law and Politics (237 papers), European Political History Analysis (219 papers) and Political Theory and Influence (200 papers). The most active scholars publishing in History of European Ideas are Peter Burke, Christopher W. Morris, Peter Baldwin, Steven M. DeLue, Stipe Grgas, Michael Maidan, Sudhir Hazareesingh, Antony Black, Ezra Talmor and Irving Louis Horowitz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in History of European Ideas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in History of European Ideas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in History of European Ideas.

Countries where authors publish in History of European Ideas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in History of European Ideas. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in History of European Ideas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History of European Ideas more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025