Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fifteen Thousand Hours: Secondary Schools and Their Effects on Children
19801.6k citationsMichael Rutter, Barbara Maughan et al.profile →
Countries citing papers authored by Peter Mortimore
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Mortimore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Mortimore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Mortimore more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Mortimore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Mortimore. The network helps show where Peter Mortimore may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Peter Mortimore
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Peter Mortimore.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Peter Mortimore based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Peter Mortimore. Peter Mortimore is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Mortimore, Peter, et al.. (2018). Behaviour Problems in Schools: An Evaluation of Support Centres. Medical Entomology and Zoology.
3.
Mortimore, Peter. (2014). The Road to Improvement: Reflections on School Effectiveness. Medical Entomology and Zoology.12 indexed citations
4.
Mortimore, Peter. (2006). A comparative review of the Government's White Paper, Higher Standards: Better Schools for All, the Education and Inspections Bill, and the NUT's education statement, bringing down the barriers.1 indexed citations
5.
MacBeath, John, et al.. (2005). Improving School Effectiveness = Memperbaiki Efektivitas Sekolah.2 indexed citations
Mortimore, Peter. (1997). The road to success : four case studies of schools which no longer require special measures. Digital Education Resource Archive (University College London).4 indexed citations
14.
Sammons, Pam, Sally Thomas, & Peter Mortimore. (1996). Towards a Model of Academic Effectiveness for Secondary Schools. Bristol Research (University of Bristol).4 indexed citations
15.
Tomlinson, John & Peter Mortimore. (1992). Small, rural and effective : a study of secondary schools. Medical Entomology and Zoology.3 indexed citations
16.
Mortimore, Peter, et al.. (1991). The secondary head : roles, responsibilities, and reflections. Medical Entomology and Zoology.8 indexed citations
17.
Mortimore, Peter, Pam Sammons, Louise Stoll, David Lewis, & Russell Ecob. (1989). A study of effective junior schools. International Journal of Educational Research. 13(7). 753–768.20 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.