Peter Hancock

777 citations
17 papers · 616 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Peter Hancock

16 papers receiving 584 citations

Peers

Peter Hancock
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Analytical Chemistry 267
  • Food Science 285
  • Spectroscopy 243
  • Pollution 105
  • Animal Science and Zoology 70
Replace Virginia Pérez‐Fernández with:
Virginia Pérez‐Fernández Italy
Natividad Ramos Martos Spain
M.J. Redondo Spain
F. García-Montelongo Spain
Silvia G. Ceballos‐Magaña Mexico
E.Maria Kristenson Netherlands
Octavio Malato Spain
George E. Miliadis Greece
В. Г. Амелин Russia
A. Jiménez Girón Spain
Peter Hancock relative to Virginia Pérez‐Fernández Italy Virginia Pérez‐Fernández's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Virginia Pérez‐Fernández · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Hancock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Hancock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Hancock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Hancock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Hancock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Hancock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Hancock. The network helps show where Peter Hancock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Hancock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Hancock Line = papers co-authored together Peter Hancock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20238
3 201934
4
Determining high-molecular-weight phthalates in sediments using GC-APCI-ToF-MS
201111
5 201086
6 200742
7 200759
8 200763
9 2005203
10 200313
11 19987
12 199714
13 19971
14 199614
15 199639
16 199512
17 19788

About Peter Hancock

Peter Hancock is a scholar working on Analytical Chemistry, Food Science, Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Animal Science and Zoology and Insect Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 616 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety (10 papers), Analytical chemistry methods development (9 papers), Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology (4 papers), Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals (3 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (3 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (2 papers), Chemical Analysis and Environmental Impact (2 papers) and Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Analytical Chemistry (267 citations), Food Science (285 citations), Spectroscopy (243 citations), Pollution (105 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (70 citations). Peter Hancock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Brendan J. Keely, Richard J. Fussell, Tania Portolés, Juan V. Sancho, Félix Hernández, Amos S. Newton, Peter J. Baugh, Graham Bonwick, M. Yasin and D. Huw Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Chromatography A, Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry, Toxics, International Journal of Environmental & Analytical Chemistry and Food and Agricultural Immunology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026