This map shows the geographic impact of Pete Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pete Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pete Thomas more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pete Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pete Thomas. The network helps show where Pete Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pete Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pete Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pete Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Pete Thomas. Pete Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Thomas, Pete, et al.. (2015). Fatal urban cyclist collisions with lorries: an in depth study of causation factors and countermeasures using a system-based approach. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).1 indexed citations
7.
Fildes, Brian, et al.. (2013). MUNDS: a new approach to evaluating safety technologies. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).1 indexed citations
8.
Fagerlind, Helen, Steven R. Reed, Julian Hill, et al.. (2011). Report on purpose of in-depth data and the shape of the new EU-infrastructure. Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology).1 indexed citations
9.
Otte, Dietmar, et al.. (2009). Assessment of Injury Severity of Nearside Occupants in Pole Impacts to Side of Passenger Cars in European Traffic Accidents - Analysis of German and UK In-Depth Data. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University). 2009.5 indexed citations
10.
Thomas, Pete, et al.. (2009). Priorities for enhanced side impact protection in regulation 95 compliant cars. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University). 2009.6 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, Pete & Richard Frampton. (2007). Real-World Assessment of Relative Crash Involvement Rates of Cars Equipped with ElectronicStability Control. 20th International Technical Conference on the Enhanced Safety of Vehicles (ESV)National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.9 indexed citations
12.
Frampton, Richard, Marianne Page, & Pete Thomas. (2006). Factors related to fatal injury in frontal crashes involving European cars.. PubMed. 50. 35–56.7 indexed citations
13.
Morris, Andrew & Pete Thomas. (2003). PENDANT: pan-european co-ordinated accident and injury databases. 2003.5 indexed citations
14.
Lamont, Timothy A. C., et al.. (2002). An agent-based traffic simulation framework to model intelligent virtual driver behaviour. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).3 indexed citations
15.
Kirk, Alan, Richard Frampton, & Pete Thomas. (2002). An evaluation of airbag benefits/disbenefits in european vehicles: a combined statistical and case study approach. Proceedings of the International Research Council on the Biomechanics of Injury conference. 30.10 indexed citations
16.
Kecman, D., James Lenard, & Pete Thomas. (1998). Safety of seats in minibuses - proposal for a dynamic test. 2. 899–906.2 indexed citations
17.
Morris, Andrew & Pete Thomas. (1996). A study of soft tissue neck injuries in the UK. 1996. 1412–1425.24 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.