Pedro Sequeira

39 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers

Pedro Sequeira
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 12
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 53
  • Social Psychology 149
  • Computer Science Applications 39
  • Orthopedics and Sports Medicine 48
Replace Ian Jones with:
Ian Jones United Kingdom
David Scholz Germany
Stamatina Anastopoulou United Kingdom
Jonathan Dobres United States
Yaqin Cao China
Anker Helms Jørgensen Denmark
Kun Yu Australia
Ericka Rovira United States
Yusuf Pisan Australia
Eleonora Mencarini Italy
Pedro Sequeira relative to Ian Jones United Kingdom Ian Jones's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.1×
Ian Jones · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Pedro Sequeira

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pedro Sequeira's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pedro Sequeira with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pedro Sequeira more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pedro Sequeira

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pedro Sequeira. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pedro Sequeira. The network helps show where Pedro Sequeira may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Pedro Sequeira, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Pedro Sequeira Line = papers co-authored together Pedro Sequeira links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 46 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202055
2 201954
3 202037
4 201523
5 201422
6 201622
7 201621
8 201621
9 201616
10 201513
11 202011
12 201111
13 201410
14 20079
15 20178
16 20128
17 20148
18 20148
19 20137
20
Interestingness Elements for Explainable Reinforcement Learning through Introspection.
20197

About Pedro Sequeira

Pedro Sequeira is a scholar working on Artificial Intelligence, Sociology and Political Science, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology and Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, having authored 46 papers that have together received 423 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (6 papers), Physical Education and Pedagogy (6 papers), Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation (4 papers), Social Robot Interaction and HRI (4 papers), Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications (4 papers), Sports Performance and Training (4 papers), Educational Games and Gamification (3 papers) and Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Life-span and Life-course Studies (12 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (53 citations), Social Psychology (149 citations), Computer Science Applications (39 citations) and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine (48 citations). Pedro Sequeira has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Ana Paiva, Melinda Gervasio, Francisco S. Melo, Patrícia Alves‐Oliveira, Ginevra Castellano, António Hernández-Mendo, Rui Resende, Hugo Sarmento, Pierre Dillenbourg and Séverin Lemaignan. Their work appears in journals such as Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, Adaptive Behavior, Artificial Intelligence, Journal of Building Engineering and Cognitive Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact