Inês Flores‐Colen

4.3k citations
188 papers · 3.2k · h-index 32

Impact in

Papers in

Inês Flores‐Colen

179 papers receiving 3.1k citations

Peers

Inês Flores‐Colen
Comparison fields: 5 of 121
  • Conservation 486
  • Earth-Surface Processes 859
  • Building and Construction 1.6k
  • Geology 258
  • Civil and Structural Engineering 925
Replace José Dinis Silvestre with:
José Dinis Silvestre Portugal
Vasco Peixoto de Freitas Portugal
M. Glória Gomes Portugal
Cinzia Buratti Italy
Targo Kalamees Estonia
Michael Yit Lin Chew Singapore
Sara Pavía Ireland
Michele Zinzi Italy
Giorgio Baldinelli Italy
Hua Ge Canada
Inês Flores‐Colen relative to José Dinis Silvestre Portugal José Dinis Silvestre's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
José Dinis Silvestre · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Inês Flores‐Colen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Inês Flores‐Colen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Inês Flores‐Colen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Inês Flores‐Colen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Inês Flores‐Colen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Inês Flores‐Colen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Inês Flores‐Colen. The network helps show where Inês Flores‐Colen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Inês Flores‐Colen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Inês Flores‐Colen Line = papers co-authored together Inês Flores‐Colen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 188 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010136
2 201792
3 200689
4 201788
5 201882
6 201982
7 201380
8 201672
9 201668
10 202067
11 201461
12 201561
13 200958
14 201354
15 202050
16 201948
17 202046
18 201745
19 202043
20 202041

About Inês Flores‐Colen

Inês Flores‐Colen is a scholar working on Building and Construction, Earth-Surface Processes, Civil and Structural Engineering, Social Psychology and Conservation, having authored 188 papers that have together received 3.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Building materials and conservation (69 papers), Facilities and Workplace Management (40 papers), Conservation Techniques and Studies (38 papers), Building Energy and Comfort Optimization (35 papers), Aerogels and thermal insulation (31 papers), 3D Surveying and Cultural Heritage (24 papers), Hygrothermal properties of building materials (20 papers) and Concrete and Cement Materials Research (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (486 citations), Earth-Surface Processes (859 citations), Building and Construction (1.6k citations), Geology (258 citations) and Civil and Structural Engineering (925 citations). Inês Flores‐Colen has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Spain and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Jorge de Brito, M. Glória Gomes, Vasco Peixoto de Freitas, António Soares, José Dinis Silvestre, Marco Pedroso, Ecem Edis, Ana Silva, Laura M. Ilharco and Clara Pereira. Their work appears in journals such as Construction and Building Materials, Journal of Building Engineering, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, Buildings and Applied Sciences.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact