David Scholz

662 citations
16 papers · 434 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

    • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety 5
    • Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion 1
    • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology 3
    • Personality Traits and Psychology 3

David Scholz

14 papers receiving 416 citations

Peers

David Scholz
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Social Psychology 296
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 116
  • Safety Research 62
  • Automotive Engineering 77
  • Health Informatics 7
Replace Peter A. M. Ruijten with:
Peter A. M. Ruijten Netherlands
Connor Esterwood United States
Qiaoning Zhang United States
Dina Stiegemeier Germany
Hananeh Alambeigi United States
Joseph Mercado United States
Yannick Forster Germany
Katelyn Procci United States
Jinchao Lin United States
Samantha Reig United States
David Scholz relative to Peter A. M. Ruijten Netherlands Peter A. M. Ruijten's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Peter A. M. Ruijten · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Scholz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Scholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Scholz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Scholz. The network helps show where David Scholz may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside David Scholz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Scholz Line = papers co-authored together David Scholz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#Work
1 2019178
2 202065
3 202049
4 201443
5 201630
6 202325
7 202217
8 202414
9 20235
10 20233
11 20242
12 20191
13 20241
14 20191
15 20170
16 20230

About David Scholz

David Scholz is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Safety Research, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 16 papers that have together received 434 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Human-Automation Interaction and Safety (5 papers), Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers), Personality Traits and Psychology (3 papers), Ethics and Social Impacts of AI (3 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (2 papers), Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion (1 paper) and Mental Health and Psychiatry (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Social Psychology (296 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (116 citations), Safety Research (62 citations), Automotive Engineering (77 citations) and Health Informatics (7 citations). David Scholz has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Denmark and Austria. Frequent co-authors include Johannes Kraus, Martin Baumann, Dina Stiegemeier, Matthias Messner, Eva-Maria Meßner, Linda Miller, Benjamin E. Hilbig, Isabel Thielmann, Philipp Höck and Florian Nothdurft. Their work appears in journals such as Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Journal of Personality, wt Werkstattstechnik online, Journal of Personality Disorders and Journal of Health Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact