Paul Curran

21 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Hit Papers

Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to...201120262016202120112015250500750

Peers

Paul Curran
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Sociology and Political Science 658
  • Social Psychology 473
  • Clinical Psychology 399
  • Applied Psychology 298
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 253
Replace Christian Schitter with:
Christian Schitter Austria
Sonam Samat United States
Paul H. P. Hanel United Kingdom
Krista Casler United States
Donald A. Hantula United States
David Hauser United States
Jonathan Robinson United States
Sandra Matz United States
Leib Litman United States
Jiyoung Park South Korea
Paul Curran relative to Christian Schitter Austria Christian Schitter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×50×102×
Christian Schitter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Paul Curran

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Curran's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Curran with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Curran more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Curran

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Curran. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Curran. The network helps show where Paul Curran may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Curran

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Curran. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Curran based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Curran. Paul Curran is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 5
2 2
3 2
4 47
5 6
6 11
7
Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey databreakdown →
799
8 25
9 4
10 36
11 29
12 26
13 23
14
Bright-light Vision Is Maintained In Older RPE65-deficient Dogs Despite Progressive Decrease in Photoreceptor Number And Reduction In Residual Electroretinographic Function
1
15
Detecting and Deterring Insufficient Effort Responding to Surveysbreakdown →
845
16 56
17 16
18
Development of a New Measure of Men's Objectification of Women: Factor Structure Test Retest Validity
6
19 4
20 2

About Paul Curran

Paul Curran is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Ophthalmology and Communication, having authored 21 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (298 citations), Social Psychology (473 citations) and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (213 citations). Paul Curran has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Jason L. Huang, Jessica Keeney, Richard P. DeShon, Elizabeth M. Poposki, Simon M. Petersen‐Jones, Joshua T. Bartoe, Stuart Blythe, Claire Lauer, James Bainbridge and Robin R. Ali. Their work appears in journals such as Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology and Cells.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026