Kenneth E. Pierce

1.5k citations
36 papers · 1.1k · h-index 17

Impact in

Papers in

Kenneth E. Pierce

36 papers receiving 1.0k citations

Peers

Kenneth E. Pierce
Comparison fields: 5 of 116
  • Pollution 124
  • Developmental Biology 20
  • Ecology 210
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 67
  • Molecular Biology 430
Replace Desheng Li with:
Desheng Li China
Maureen Bain United Kingdom
Na Han China
William G. Henk United States
Si‐Ming Zhang United States
Wes Baumgartner United States
Emanuele Capra Italy
J. Baker United Kingdom
Tom Morrison United States
Kirill Kryukov Japan
Kenneth E. Pierce relative to Desheng Li China Desheng Li's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Desheng Li · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Kenneth E. Pierce

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kenneth E. Pierce's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kenneth E. Pierce with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kenneth E. Pierce more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kenneth E. Pierce

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kenneth E. Pierce. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kenneth E. Pierce. The network helps show where Kenneth E. Pierce may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Kenneth E. Pierce, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Kenneth E. Pierce Line = papers co-authored together Kenneth E. Pierce links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 36 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2007176
2 2004172
3 2004136
4 200598
5 200048
6
Efficacy of acemannan in treatment of canine and feline spontaneous neoplasms.
199147
7 199837
8 199034
9 200733
10 199727
11 200425
12 200223
13 200322
14 200222
15 200621
16 199219
17 200917
18 200416
19 200614
20 200114

About Kenneth E. Pierce

Kenneth E. Pierce is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Ecology and Genetics, having authored 36 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications (10 papers), Advanced biosensing and bioanalysis techniques (8 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (6 papers), Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (5 papers), Bacteriophages and microbial interactions (4 papers), Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (4 papers) and Biosensors and Analytical Detection (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pollution (124 citations), Developmental Biology (20 citations), Ecology (210 citations), Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering (67 citations) and Molecular Biology (430 citations). Kenneth E. Pierce has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Lawrence J. Wangh, John E. Rice, J. Aquiles Sanchez, Daniel Ward, Michael Jones, Richard B. Harris, Mark A. Pokras, Gregory S. Kopf, Richard M. Schultz and Patricia G. Calarco. Their work appears in journals such as Developmental Biology, Molecular Human Reproduction, BioTechniques, Fertility and Sterility and Veterinary Ophthalmology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact