Kathleen Schmidt
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Applied Psychology
- Co-authors
- Brian A. NosekJordan AxtBryant M. StoneCheryl HahnNicole M. LindnerCarlee Beth HawkinsSelin KesebirMatt Motyl
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers)Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers)Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers)
- Journals
- Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Schmidt
15 papers receiving 263 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Sociology and Political Science 127
- Social Psychology 74
- Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 38
- Cognitive Neuroscience 32
- Applied Psychology 32
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Schmidt
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Schmidt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Schmidt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Schmidt. The network helps show where Kathleen Schmidt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Schmidt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Schmidt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Schmidt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Schmidt. Kathleen Schmidt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | Best practices for addressing missing data through multiple imputationbreakdown → | 71 |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | 69 | |
| 15 | Cumulative and Career-Stage Citation Impact of Social-Personality Psychology Programs and Their Members | 1 |
| 16 | 76 | |
| 17 | 2 |
About Kathleen Schmidt
Kathleen Schmidt is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Applied Psychology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 17 papers that have together received 282 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (32 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (38 citations) and General Psychology (5 citations). Kathleen Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Brian A. Nosek, Jordan Axt, Bryant M. Stone, Cheryl Hahn, Nicole M. Lindner, Carlee Beth Hawkins, Selin Kesebir, Matt Motyl, Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba and Jesse Graham. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.