Kathleen Schmidt

5.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
17 papers, 282 citations indexed

About

Kathleen Schmidt is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. According to data from OpenAlex, Kathleen Schmidt has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 282 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty. Recurrent topics in Kathleen Schmidt's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers). Kathleen Schmidt is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (6 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (5 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (4 papers). Kathleen Schmidt collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Kathleen Schmidt's co-authors include Brian A. Nosek, Jordan Axt, Bryant M. Stone, Carlee Beth Hawkins, Cheryl Hahn, Elizabeth R. Tenney, Selin Kesebir, Matt Motyl, Nicole M. Lindner and Jennifer A. Joy-Gaba and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.

In The Last Decade

Kathleen Schmidt

15 papers receiving 263 citations

Hit Papers

Best practices for addres... 2023 2026 2024 2023 20 40 60

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kathleen Schmidt United States 6 127 74 38 32 32 17 282
Caitlyn Yantis United States 8 143 1.1× 64 0.9× 50 1.3× 17 0.5× 16 0.5× 16 257
Anthony N. Washburn United States 7 201 1.6× 82 1.1× 51 1.3× 84 2.6× 27 0.8× 9 323
Sarah R. Schiavone Australia 6 122 1.0× 65 0.9× 67 1.8× 45 1.4× 17 0.5× 11 282
Amina Muazzam Pakistan 11 79 0.6× 73 1.0× 11 0.3× 14 0.4× 22 0.7× 43 282
Aurélien Allard Switzerland 5 86 0.7× 63 0.9× 94 2.5× 69 2.2× 36 1.1× 11 395
Claudia van den Heuvel United Kingdom 7 142 1.1× 120 1.6× 10 0.3× 63 2.0× 12 0.4× 7 359
Natalia Bezerra Dutra Brazil 8 52 0.4× 63 0.9× 27 0.7× 24 0.8× 20 0.6× 12 252
Eirik Strømland Norway 6 74 0.6× 37 0.5× 48 1.3× 61 1.9× 28 0.9× 12 255
Robert O. Hartman United States 5 95 0.7× 58 0.8× 4 0.1× 29 0.9× 24 0.8× 7 248
Charles Dorison United States 7 85 0.7× 48 0.6× 5 0.1× 27 0.8× 34 1.1× 19 193

Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Schmidt. The network helps show where Kathleen Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Schmidt

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Schmidt. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Schmidt based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Schmidt. Kathleen Schmidt is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Nagy, Tamás, Mahmoud Medhat Elsherif, Kathleen Schmidt, et al.. (2025). Bestiary of Questionable Research Practices in Psychology. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 8(3).
2.
Schmidt, Kathleen, Gerald J. Haeffel, Neil Levy, et al.. (2024). A Response to a Comment on Hall et al. (2024). Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 7(4). 1 indexed citations
3.
Woods, Adrienne D., Ben Van Dusen, Jayson Nissen, et al.. (2023). Best practices for addressing missing data through multiple imputation. Infant and Child Development. 33(1). 71 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Schmidt, Kathleen, et al.. (2023). Minimal Group Procedures and Outcomes. Collabra Psychology. 9(1).
5.
Calanchini, Jimmy, et al.. (2022). The contributions of positive outgroup and negative ingroup evaluation to implicit bias favoring outgroups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119(40). e2116924119–e2116924119. 9 indexed citations
6.
Schmidt, Kathleen, et al.. (2022). Registered report: Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit measures of evaluation and identification. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 100. 104280–104280. 4 indexed citations
7.
Schmidt, Kathleen, et al.. (2022). First target timing influences the attentional blink under low, but not high working memory load. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 85(1). 1–8. 1 indexed citations
8.
Botchway, Albert, Kathleen Schmidt, Ronald F. Zec, et al.. (2022). Cognitive Component Structure of a Neuropsychological Battery Administered to Cognitively-Normal Adults in the SIU Longitudinal Cognitive Aging Study. Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine. 8. 2612173229–2612173229. 2 indexed citations
9.
Stone, Bryant M. & Kathleen Schmidt. (2022). Comparing the Grit Scales’ Structural Validity and Measurement Invariance Across Educational Attainment and Age. International Journal of Applied Positive Psychology. 7(3). 301–326. 3 indexed citations
10.
Corker, Katherine S., Jack Arnal, Diane B. V. Bonfiglio, et al.. (2020). Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Albarracín et al. (2008), Experiment 7. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 3(3). 340–352. 2 indexed citations
11.
Stone, Bryant M. & Kathleen Schmidt. (2020). Positive psychological interventions and cognition. The Journal of Positive Psychology. 15(5). 629–632. 12 indexed citations
12.
Chartier, Christopher R., Jack Arnal, Holly Arrow, et al.. (2020). Many Labs 5: Registered Replication of Albarracín et al. (2008), Experiment 5. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 3(3). 332–339. 4 indexed citations
13.
Schmidt, Kathleen & Jordan Axt. (2016). Implicit and Explicit Attitudes Toward African Americans and Barack Obama Did not Substantively Change During Obama's Presidency. Social Cognition. 34(6). 559–588. 25 indexed citations
14.
Nosek, Brian A., Jesse Graham, Nicole M. Lindner, et al.. (2010). Cumulative and Career-Stage Citation Impact of Social-Personality Psychology Programs and Their Members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 36(10). 1283–1300. 69 indexed citations
15.
Nosek, Brian A., Jesse Graham, Nicole M. Lindner, et al.. (2009). Cumulative and Career-Stage Citation Impact of Social-Personality Psychology Programs and Their Members. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
16.
Schmidt, Kathleen & Brian A. Nosek. (2009). Implicit (and explicit) racial attitudes barely changed during Barack Obama’s presidential campaign and early presidency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 46(2). 308–314. 76 indexed citations
17.
Turkheimer, Federico, Karen D. Pettigrew, Louis Sokoloff, & Kathleen Schmidt. (1999). A minimum variance adaptive technique for parameter estimation and hypothesis testing. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation. 28(4). 931–956. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026