Stuart Blythe
Impact in
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies
- Literacy, Media, and Education
- Communication top 10%
- Social Media and Politics
- Knowledge Management and Sharing
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Discourse Analysis in Language Studies 5
- Literacy, Media, and Education 1
-
- Wikis in Education and Collaboration 2
- Co-authors
- Jeffrey T. Grabill (3 shared papers)Claire Lauer (2 shared papers)James E. Porter (2 shared papers)Libby Miles (2 shared papers)Patricia Sullivan (2 shared papers)Paul Curran (1 shared paper)Michael K. McLeod (1 shared paper)Laura Gonzales (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- College Composition and Communication (3 papers)Journal of Business and Technical Communication (3 papers)Computers & composition (1 paper)Technical Communication Quarterly (1 paper)Written Communication (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Stuart Blythe
13 papers receiving 216 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 65
- Literature and Literary Theory 94
- Communication 52
- Human-Computer Interaction 34
- Computer Science Applications 14
- Education 72
Countries citing papers authored by Stuart Blythe
This map shows the geographic impact of Stuart Blythe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stuart Blythe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stuart Blythe more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stuart Blythe
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stuart Blythe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stuart Blythe. The network helps show where Stuart Blythe may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 8 scholars most cited alongside Stuart Blythe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2008 | 64 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 60 | |
| 3 | 2001 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2014 | 36 | |
| 5 | 2007 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 14 | |
| 7 | 2000 | 8 | |
| 8 | Coding Digital Texts and Multimedia | 2007 | 8 |
| 9 | Technologies and writing center practices: A critical approach | 1997 | 5 |
| 10 | 2004 | 4 | |
| 11 | 1997 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 13 | Agencies, Ecologies, and the Mundane Artifacts in Our Midst | 2007 | 3 |
About Stuart Blythe
Stuart Blythe is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, Computer Science Applications, Human-Computer Interaction and Philosophy, having authored 13 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (5 papers), Wikis in Education and Collaboration (2 papers), Literacy, Media, and Education (1 paper), Design Education and Practice (1 paper), Higher Education Practises and Engagement (1 paper), Team Dynamics and Performance (1 paper), Web and Library Services (1 paper) and Survey Methodology and Nonresponse (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (94 citations), Communication (52 citations), Human-Computer Interaction (34 citations), Computer Science Applications (14 citations) and Education (72 citations). Stuart Blythe has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey T. Grabill, Claire Lauer, James E. Porter, Libby Miles, Patricia Sullivan, Paul Curran, Michael K. McLeod and Laura Gonzales. Their work appears in journals such as College Composition and Communication, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, Computers & composition, Technical Communication Quarterly and Written Communication.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.