Olaf Op den Camp

16 papers receiving 205 citations

Peers

Olaf Op den Camp
Comparison fields: 5 of 41
  • Automotive Engineering 159
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 109
  • Control and Systems Engineering 72
  • Social Psychology 52
  • Artificial Intelligence 27
Replace Erwin de Gelder with:
Erwin de Gelder Netherlands
Kazutoshi Nobukawa United States
Tobias Moers Germany
Mark Koren United States
Duc-Thinh Pham Singapore
Quan Tran United States
Chejian Xu United States
Daocheng Fu China
Stefan Orf Germany
Douglas R. Isaacson United States
Olaf Op den Camp relative to Erwin de Gelder Netherlands Erwin de Gelder's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Erwin de Gelder · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Olaf Op den Camp

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Olaf Op den Camp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Olaf Op den Camp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Olaf Op den Camp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Olaf Op den Camp

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Olaf Op den Camp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Olaf Op den Camp. The network helps show where Olaf Op den Camp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Olaf Op den Camp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Olaf Op den Camp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Olaf Op den Camp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Olaf Op den Camp. Olaf Op den Camp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 1
3 4
4 5
5 6
6 38
7 30
8 9
9 2
10 30
11 8
12 20
13
Automatic Identification of Critical Scenarios in a Public Dataset of 6000 km of Public-Road Driving
12
14
StreetWise: scenario-based safety validation of connected automated driving
16
15 21
16
Prospective effectiveness assessment of adas and active safety systems via virtual simulation: a review of the current practices
16
17
A comprehensive and harmonized method for assessing the effectiveness of advanced driver assistance systems by virtual simulation: The P.E.A.R.S
13

About Olaf Op den Camp

Olaf Op den Camp is a scholar working on Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, Automotive Engineering and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 17 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety (13 papers), Traffic and Road Safety (8 papers) and Traffic control and management (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Automotive Engineering (159 citations), Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (109 citations) and Software (23 citations). Olaf Op den Camp has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Austria and Sweden. Frequent co-authors include Erwin de Gelder, Jan‐Pieter Paardekooper, Bart De Schutter, Jeroen Ploeg, Steven Kraines, Eric Cator, Ulrich Sander, Yves Page, Thomas Helmer and Peter Wimmer. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Access, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems and Accident Analysis & Prevention.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026