Noor Christoph
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 10%
- Surgery
- Biomedical Engineering
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Human-Computer Interaction top 5%
- Co-authors
- Marlies P. SchijvenEsther Z. BarsomHenny LeemkuilRobert de HoogTon de JongJulian McGlashanEllen M.A. SmetsNanon Labrie
- Topics
- Voice and Speech Disorders (4 papers)Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Human-Computer InteractionComputer Vision and Pattern RecognitionDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomNorway
In The Last Decade
Noor Christoph
9 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 124
- Surgery 97
- Biomedical Engineering 87
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 72
- Human-Computer Interaction 58
Countries citing papers authored by Noor Christoph
This map shows the geographic impact of Noor Christoph's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Noor Christoph with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Noor Christoph more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Noor Christoph
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Noor Christoph. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Noor Christoph. The network helps show where Noor Christoph may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Noor Christoph
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Noor Christoph. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Noor Christoph based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Noor Christoph. Noor Christoph is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 18 | |
| 7 | 201 | |
| 8 | Added value of a task model and role of metacognition in learning | 1 |
| 9 | 82 | |
| 10 | 3 |
About Noor Christoph
Noor Christoph is a scholar working on Family Practice, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Human-Computer Interaction, having authored 10 papers that have together received 326 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Voice and Speech Disorders (4 papers), Phonetics and Phonology Research (3 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (58 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (124 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (72 citations). Noor Christoph has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Marlies P. Schijven, Esther Z. Barsom, Henny Leemkuil, Robert de Hoog, Ton de Jong, Julian McGlashan, Ellen M.A. Smets, Nanon Labrie, Marie José Kersten and Robert L. Hulsman. Their work appears in journals such as Medical Education, British Journal of Educational Technology and Journal of Voice.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.