Nanon Labrie

1.1k citations
54 papers · 640 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Nanon Labrie

49 papers receiving 629 citations

Peers

Nanon Labrie
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Radiological and Ultrasound Technology 134
  • General Health Professions 280
  • Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 186
  • Family Practice 16
  • Language and Linguistics 53
Replace Susan Parks with:
Susan Parks United States
Anne McQueen United Kingdom
Stuart Ekberg Australia
Carla L. Fisher United States
Honor Nicholl Ireland
Mary Ann Swain United States
Arlene M. Katz United States
Alireza Yousefy Iran
Cristina García‐Vivar Spain
Fatemeh Khoshnavay Fomani Iran
Nanon Labrie relative to Susan Parks United States Susan Parks's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Susan Parks · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nanon Labrie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nanon Labrie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nanon Labrie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nanon Labrie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nanon Labrie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nanon Labrie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nanon Labrie. The network helps show where Nanon Labrie may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nanon Labrie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Nanon Labrie Line = papers co-authored together Nanon Labrie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 54 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202177
2 202148
3 201343
4 202040
5 201933
6 202131
7 201527
8 202027
9 202226
10 201423
11 201123
12 202021
13 201818
14 201718
15 201917
16 201415
17 202114
18 202310
19 201910
20 202110

About Nanon Labrie

Nanon Labrie is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Language and Linguistics, Social Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 54 papers that have together received 640 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (20 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (11 papers), Infant Development and Preterm Care (7 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (6 papers), Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Health Literacy and Information Accessibility (4 papers), Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (4 papers) and Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Radiological and Ultrasound Technology (134 citations), General Health Professions (280 citations), Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (186 citations), Family Practice (16 citations) and Language and Linguistics (53 citations). Nanon Labrie has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Switzerland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter J. Schulz, Nicole R. van Veenendaal, Anne Van Kempen, Ramona Ludolph, Johannes C. F. Ket, Sophie R. D. van der Schoor, Ellen M.A. Smets, Sandra van Dulmen, Marie José Kersten and Arwen H. Pieterse. Their work appears in journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Health Communication, BMJ Open, Argumentation and Early Human Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact