Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load
2016291 citationsSevda Küçük, Samet Kapakin et al.Anatomical Sciences Educationprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Samet Kapakin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Samet Kapakin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Samet Kapakin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Samet Kapakin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Samet Kapakin. The network helps show where Samet Kapakin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Samet Kapakin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Samet Kapakin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Samet Kapakin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Samet Kapakin. Samet Kapakin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Küçük, Sevda, Samet Kapakin, & Yüksel Göktaş. (2016). Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: Effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anatomical Sciences Education. 9(5). 411–421.291 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Kapakin, Samet, et al.. (2015). Histopathological findings and apoptosis caused by E. coli in layer birds.. Pakistan Veterinary Journal. 35(4). 525–527.3 indexed citations
9.
Küçük, Sevda, Samet Kapakin, & Yüksel Göktaş. (2015). Tıp Fakültesi Öğrencilerinin Mobil Artırılmış Gerçeklikle Anatomi Öğrenimine Yönelik Görüşleri. 5(3). 316–323.2 indexed citations
Kapakin, Samet. (2011). Stereolithographic biomodelling to create tangible hard copies of the ethmoidal labyrinth air cells based on the visible human project.. PubMed. 70(1). 33–40.4 indexed citations
Kapakin, Samet. (2011). The claustrum: three-dimensional reconstruction, photorealistic imaging, and stereotactic approach.. PubMed. 70(4). 228–34.13 indexed citations
15.
Kapakin, Samet & Deniz Demiryürek. (2009). The reproduction accuracy for stereolithographic model of the thyroid gland derived from the visible human dataset.. PubMed. 30(7). 887–92.2 indexed citations
16.
Sargon, Mustafa F., et al.. (2004). Quantitative analysis of myelinated axons of commissural fibers in the cat brain.. PubMed. 9(3). 171–5.4 indexed citations
17.
Tatar, İlkan, Bektaş Açıkgöz, M. Mustafa Aldur, et al.. (2004). Circumventricular organs of rats that experimental hydrocephalus and subarachnoidal hemorrhage carried out: an anaglyphic SEM study.1 indexed citations
18.
Mas, Nüket, et al.. (2003). A case of bilateral high division of the sciatic nerves, together with a unilateral unusual course of the tibial nerve.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.