Nina C. Martin
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 8
- Eating Disorders and Behaviors 2
- Child Abuse and Trauma 2
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression 4
- Education top 5%
- Early Childhood Education and Development 3
- Child Development and Digital Technology 2
- Safety Research top 5%
-
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet 6
-
- Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues 2
- Co-authors
- Judy GarberMargaret K. KeileyDavid A. ColeJulia W. FeltonKathryn M. RoederWilliam J. HeermanTammy L. DukewichRachel L. Zelkowitz
- Journals
- JAMA (1 paper)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (2 papers)Journal of Abnormal Psychology (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Nina C. Martin
16 papers receiving 867 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
- Clinical Psychology 573
- Social Psychology 334
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 140
- Education 283
- Safety Research 67
Countries citing papers authored by Nina C. Martin
This map shows the geographic impact of Nina C. Martin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina C. Martin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina C. Martin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nina C. Martin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina C. Martin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina C. Martin. The network helps show where Nina C. Martin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Nina C. Martin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 13 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 72 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 17 | |
| 7 | 2016 | 90 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 63 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 68 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 21 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 37 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 49 | |
| 14 | 2007 | 28 | |
| 15 | 2005 | 14 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 218 | |
| 17 | 2002 | 180 |
About Nina C. Martin
Nina C. Martin is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Transportation and Social Psychology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 911 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (6 papers), Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression (4 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (2 papers), Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (2 papers) and Child Development and Digital Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (573 citations), Social Psychology (334 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (140 citations). Nina C. Martin has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Judy Garber, Margaret K. Keiley, David A. Cole, Julia W. Felton, Kathryn M. Roeder, William J. Heerman, Tammy L. Dukewich, Rachel L. Zelkowitz, Tawny Spinelli and Sarah A. Bilsky. Their work appears in journals such as JAMA, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.