Neeta Kantamneni
- Safety Research top 1%
- Education top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nadya A. FouadMary E. FitzpatrickElizabeth W. CotterSarah TerryGail HackettPhilip L. SmithSusan HaagTheodore T. Bartholomew
- Topics
- Career Development and Diversity (14 papers)Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers)Higher Education and Employability (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Neeta Kantamneni
21 papers receiving 635 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Safety Research 416
- Education 334
- Social Psychology 212
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 133
- Sociology and Political Science 116
Countries citing papers authored by Neeta Kantamneni
This map shows the geographic impact of Neeta Kantamneni's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Neeta Kantamneni with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Neeta Kantamneni more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Neeta Kantamneni
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Neeta Kantamneni. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Neeta Kantamneni. The network helps show where Neeta Kantamneni may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Neeta Kantamneni
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Neeta Kantamneni. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Neeta Kantamneni based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Neeta Kantamneni. Neeta Kantamneni is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | The impact of the COVID populations in the United States: A research agenda | 1 |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 17 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Cultural validity of Holland's theory. | 1 |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 68 | |
| 14 | 130 | |
| 15 | 11 | |
| 16 | 108 | |
| 17 | Contextual factors in vocational psychology: Intersections of individual, group, and societal dimensions. | 22 |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 104 | |
| 20 | 106 |
About Neeta Kantamneni
Neeta Kantamneni is a scholar working on Safety Research, Communication and Gender Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 685 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Career Development and Diversity (14 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (7 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (416 citations), Education (334 citations) and Social Psychology (212 citations). Neeta Kantamneni has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Nadya A. Fouad, Mary E. Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth W. Cotter, Sarah Terry, Gail Hackett, Philip L. Smith, Susan Haag, Theodore T. Bartholomew, Sherry Wang and Paul E. Priester. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vocational Behavior, The Counseling Psychologist and Journal of Career Assessment.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.