Nava Michael‐Tsabari

405 total citations
9 papers, 235 citations indexed

About

Nava Michael‐Tsabari is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Management of Technology and Innovation and Accounting. According to data from OpenAlex, Nava Michael‐Tsabari has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 235 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 6 papers in Management of Technology and Innovation and 4 papers in Accounting. Recurrent topics in Nava Michael‐Tsabari's work include Family Business Performance and Succession (9 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (6 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers). Nava Michael‐Tsabari is often cited by papers focused on Family Business Performance and Succession (9 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (6 papers) and Corporate Finance and Governance (4 papers). Nava Michael‐Tsabari collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and France. Nava Michael‐Tsabari's co-authors include Ramona K. Zachary, Rania Labaki, Dan Weiss, Yoav Lavee, Vanessa M. Strike, Dorit Efrat‐Treister, Wee Liang Tan, Nadine Kammerlander, Nina Gupta and Etti Doveh and has published in prestigious journals such as Family Business Review, Journal of Small Business Management and Human Resource Management.

In The Last Decade

Nava Michael‐Tsabari

9 papers receiving 224 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nava Michael‐Tsabari Israel	6	222	176	109	57	13	9	235
Heiko Kleve Germany	5	69 0.3×	44 0.3×	13 0.1×	34 0.6×	6 0.5×	35	97
Ooi Yeng Keat Malaysia	5	34 0.2×	83 0.5×	11 0.1×	4 0.1×	4 0.3×	11	101
Jacqueline Harris United States	6	20 0.1×	27 0.2×	4 0.0×	7 0.1×	3 0.2×	14	70
Amjad Ali China	5	61 0.3×	4 0.0×	8 0.1×	13 0.2×	8 0.6×	14	104
Henry C. Metcalf	7	60 0.3×	8 0.0×	4 0.0×	21 0.4×	16 1.2×	8	108
Reg Revans United Kingdom	6	51 0.2×	14 0.1×	3 0.0×	15 0.3×	8 0.6×	14	149
Nina Lamatenggo Indonesia	4	25 0.1×	20 0.1×	5 0.0×	13 0.2×		21	239
Erich Latniak Germany	6	29 0.1×	27 0.2×	1 0.0×	49 0.9×	13 1.0×	29	109
Nasir Usman Indonesia	10	10 0.0×	26 0.1×	4 0.0×	26 0.5×	3 0.2×	93	361
Akhmad Sirojuddin Indonesia	11	8 0.0×	23 0.1×	7 0.1×	78 1.4×		30	380

Countries citing papers authored by Nava Michael‐Tsabari

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nava Michael‐Tsabari's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nava Michael‐Tsabari with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nava Michael‐Tsabari more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nava Michael‐Tsabari

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nava Michael‐Tsabari. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nava Michael‐Tsabari. The network helps show where Nava Michael‐Tsabari may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nava Michael‐Tsabari

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nava Michael‐Tsabari. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nava Michael‐Tsabari based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nava Michael‐Tsabari. Nava Michael‐Tsabari is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

Michael‐Tsabari, Nava, et al.. (2025). Joint ownership between family and steward private equity investors: an ownership-competence view. Journal of Small Business Management. 64(2). 598–637. 3 indexed citations

Michael‐Tsabari, Nava, et al.. (2020). Uncovering Implicit Assumptions: Reviewing the Work–Family Interface in Family Business and Offering Opportunities for Future Research. Family Business Review. 33(1). 64–89. 23 indexed citations

Bamberger, Peter, et al.. (2020). Stingy principals or benevolent stewards: Reward practices in family versus nonfamily trucking companies. Human Resource Management. 60(6). 935–952. 2 indexed citations

Michael‐Tsabari, Nava, et al.. (2018). With or without emotions: how does history matter for family business survival?. Entreprises et histoire. n° 91(2). 138–145. 2 indexed citations

Michael‐Tsabari, Nava, Rania Labaki, & Ramona K. Zachary. (2014). Toward the Cluster Model. Family Business Review. 27(2). 161–185. 77 indexed citations

Labaki, Rania, Nava Michael‐Tsabari, & Ramona K. Zachary. (2013). Exploring the Emotional Nexus in Cogent Family Business Archetypes. Entrepreneurship Research Journal. 3(3). 58 indexed citations

Michael‐Tsabari, Nava & Wee Liang Tan. (2013). Exploring Family Features in Non-family Organizations: The Family Metaphor and Its Behavioral Manifestations. Entrepreneurship Research Journal. 3(3). 6 indexed citations

Michael‐Tsabari, Nava & Dan Weiss. (2013). Communication Traps. Family Business Review. 28(1). 26–40. 40 indexed citations

Michael‐Tsabari, Nava & Yoav Lavee. (2012). Too close and too rigid: Applying the Circumplex Model of Family Systems to First‐Generation Family Firms. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy. 38(s1). 105–116. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact