Nathaniel J. Williams
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Rinad S. BeidasCharles GlissonPhilip GreenGregory A. AaronsAnthony L. HemmelgarnByron J. PowellCara C. LewisBryan J. Weiner
- Topics
- Health Policy Implementation Science (43 papers)Mental Health and Patient Involvement (18 papers)Primary Care and Health Outcomes (17 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCzechia
In The Last Decade
Nathaniel J. Williams
76 papers receiving 2.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- General Health Professions 1.6k
- Clinical Psychology 614
- Social Psychology 252
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 183
- Sociology and Political Science 174
Countries citing papers authored by Nathaniel J. Williams
This map shows the geographic impact of Nathaniel J. Williams's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nathaniel J. Williams with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nathaniel J. Williams more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Nathaniel J. Williams
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nathaniel J. Williams. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nathaniel J. Williams. The network helps show where Nathaniel J. Williams may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nathaniel J. Williams
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nathaniel J. Williams. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nathaniel J. Williams based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nathaniel J. Williams. Nathaniel J. Williams is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 15 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 23 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 11 | |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 11 | |
| 15 | 60 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 83 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 22 | |
| 20 | Culturally anchored methodology: A special issue | 7 |
About Nathaniel J. Williams
Nathaniel J. Williams is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Public Administration and Applied Psychology, having authored 80 papers that have together received 2.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health Policy Implementation Science (43 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (18 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (1.6k citations), Public Administration (114 citations) and Clinical Psychology (614 citations). Nathaniel J. Williams has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include Rinad S. Beidas, Charles Glisson, Philip Green, Gregory A. Aarons, Anthony L. Hemmelgarn, Byron J. Powell, Cara C. Lewis, Bryan J. Weiner, Sheena McHugh and María E. Fernández. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.