Mimi Choy-Brown
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Clinical Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Public Administration top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Victoria StanhopeDeborah K. PadgettBikki Tran SmithEmmy TideringtonBenjamin F. HenwoodSarah A. BirkenSteven C. MarcusLawrence A. Palinkas
- Topics
- Mental Health and Patient Involvement (17 papers)Health Policy Implementation Science (13 papers)Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPreventive MedicinePsychiatric Services
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwedenNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Mimi Choy-Brown
33 papers receiving 405 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- General Health Professions 328
- Clinical Psychology 94
- Social Psychology 58
- Public Administration 55
- Sociology and Political Science 50
Countries citing papers authored by Mimi Choy-Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Mimi Choy-Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mimi Choy-Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mimi Choy-Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mimi Choy-Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mimi Choy-Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mimi Choy-Brown. The network helps show where Mimi Choy-Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mimi Choy-Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mimi Choy-Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mimi Choy-Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mimi Choy-Brown. Mimi Choy-Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 42 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 18 |
About Mimi Choy-Brown
Mimi Choy-Brown is a scholar working on Public Administration, General Health Professions and Social Psychology, having authored 36 papers that have together received 425 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health and Patient Involvement (17 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (13 papers) and Homelessness and Social Issues (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (55 citations), General Health Professions (328 citations) and Clinical Psychology (94 citations). Mimi Choy-Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Victoria Stanhope, Deborah K. Padgett, Bikki Tran Smith, Emmy Tiderington, Benjamin F. Henwood, Sarah A. Birken, Steven C. Marcus, Lawrence A. Palinkas, Amy S. He and Nathaniel J. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Preventive Medicine and Psychiatric Services.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.