Learning Research and Practice

382 papers and 1.5k indexed citations i.

About

The 382 papers published in Learning Research and Practice in the last decades have received a total of 1.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Learning Research and Practice usually cover Education (151 papers), Developmental and Educational Psychology (80 papers) and Clinical Psychology (22 papers) specifically the topics of Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (42 papers), Education and Critical Thinking Development (27 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (23 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Learning Research and Practice are Manu Kapur, Peter Reimann, Alexander Renkl, Mike Sharples, Deanna Kuhn, Tim Gorichanaz, Barbara A. Hendrickson, Wendy Moore, Ching Sing Chai and Joyce Hwee Ling Koh.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Learning Research and Practice

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Learning Research and Practice. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Learning Research and Practice.

Countries where authors publish in Learning Research and Practice

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Learning Research and Practice. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Learning Research and Practice with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Learning Research and Practice more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025