N. O’Connor

3.0k citations
96 papers · 2.0k indexed · h-index 27

N. O’Connor

93 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers

N. O’Connor
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 821
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
  • Statistics and Probability 232
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 362
  • Developmental Neuroscience 65
Replace Linda Pring with:
Linda Pring United Kingdom
Beate Hermelin United Kingdom
Mark Strauss United States
Malcolm Piercy United Kingdom
Linda J. Lombardino United States
Steve Miller United States
Giuseppe Cossu Italy
Rosemary Varley United Kingdom
Frances A. Conners United States
J. Graham Beaumont United Kingdom
N. O’Connor relative to Linda Pring United Kingdom Linda Pring's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Linda Pring · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by N. O’Connor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of N. O’Connor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by N. O’Connor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites N. O’Connor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by N. O’Connor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by N. O’Connor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by N. O’Connor. The network helps show where N. O’Connor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside N. O’Connor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with N. O’Connor Line = papers co-authored together N. O’Connor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 202030
2 20152
3 201038
4
TennisSense: a multi-sensory approach to performance analysis in tennis
20095
5 199446
6 199219
7 199040
8 198939
9 198945
10 19871
11 1986104
12 198459
13 198316
14 197321
15 196713
16 196511
17 196520
18 196113
19
Defectives working in the community.
19542
20 195215

About N. O’Connor

N. O’Connor is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability and Music, having authored 96 papers that have together received 2.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (10 papers), Tactile and Sensory Interactions (8 papers), Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (7 papers), Spatial Cognition and Navigation (7 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (7 papers), Multisensory perception and integration (7 papers), Cognitive Abilities and Testing (6 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (821 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Statistics and Probability (232 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (362 citations) and Developmental Neuroscience (65 citations). N. O’Connor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Mexico and United States. Frequent co-authors include Beate Hermelin, John Sloboda, Jack Tizard, Peter H. Venables, Darold A. Treffert, K Rawnsley, Gordon Claridge, M. Ethunandan, V. Lopes and Manish Patel. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Psychology, Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, Psychological Medicine, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Neuropsychologia.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026