Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Nixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Nixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Nixon more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Nixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Nixon. The network helps show where Mark Nixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Nixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Nixon.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Nixon based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Nixon. Mark Nixon is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Nixon, Mark, et al.. (2012). Model-based feature refinement by ellipsoidal face tracking. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
8.
Kelly, Philip, Shirley Coyle, Mark Nixon, et al.. (2009). TennisSense: a multi-sensory approach to performance analysis in tennis. Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology).5 indexed citations
9.
Yoo, Jang‐Hee, Mark Nixon, & C.J. Harris. (2002). Extracting Gait Signatures based on Anatomical Knowledge. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).27 indexed citations
10.
Tatem, Andrew J., Hugh G. Lewis, Peter M. Atkinson, & Mark Nixon. (2001). Dealing with uncertainty in super-resolution land cover mapping. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).1 indexed citations
11.
Nixon, Mark, et al.. (2001). Automatic Gait Recognition via the Generalised Symmetry Operator. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
12.
Gunn, S.R., et al.. (2000). A Supervised Method for PET Reference Region Extraction. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
13.
Lewis, Hugh G., Mark Nixon, & A.R.L. Tatnall. (1999). Appropriate strategies for mapping land cover from satellite imagery. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
14.
Nixon, Mark, et al.. (1999). Extending Concentricity Analysis by Deformable Templates for Improved Eye Extraction. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
15.
Nixon, Mark, et al.. (1998). Extracting a Human Gait Model for use as a Biometric. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).4 indexed citations
16.
Chen, Yan Qiu, Mark Nixon, & David W. P. Thomas. (1994). Neural Networks and Texture Classification. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).2 indexed citations
17.
Gunn, S.R. & Mark Nixon. (1994). A Dual Active Contour for Head Boundary Extraction. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).8 indexed citations
18.
Evans, A.N. & Mark Nixon. (1993). Temporal Methods for Ultrasound Speckle Reduction. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).6 indexed citations
19.
Nixon, Mark, et al.. (1992). On Biometric Systems. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
20.
Nixon, Mark, et al.. (1992). Developing an Extended Feature Set for Automatic Face Recognition. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.