Developmental Neuroscience

183.4k papers and 7.0M indexed citations i.

About

183.4k papers covering Developmental Neuroscience have received a total of 7.0M indexed citations since 1950. Papers on subfields are most often about the specific topic of Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research, Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms and Anesthesia and Sedative Agents and also cover the fields of Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine. Papers citing papers on subfields are usually about Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Neurology. Some of the most active scholars covering Developmental Neuroscience are Fred H. Gage, Pasko Rakić, Arturo Álvarez-Buylla, Gerd Kempermann, Joseph Altman, Ronald S. Duman, Bruce S. McEwen, Elizabeth Gould, Ben A. Barres and H. Thoenen.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers citing papers about Developmental Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers covering Developmental Neuroscience. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering Developmental Neuroscience.

Countries where authors publish papers about Developmental Neuroscience

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research in Developmental Neuroscience. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about Developmental Neuroscience with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Developmental Neuroscience more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore fields with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025