Molly Blackley Jackson
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Family Practice top 5%
- Physiology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Marjorie D. WenrichIneke H. A. P. WolfhagenPaul G. RamseyErika A. GoldsteinAlbert ScherpbierLynne RobinsDoug SchaadSusan E. Merel
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers)Nursing education and management (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Molly Blackley Jackson
11 papers receiving 232 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 179
- General Health Professions 86
- Family Practice 64
- Physiology 43
- Psychiatry and Mental health 43
Countries citing papers authored by Molly Blackley Jackson
This map shows the geographic impact of Molly Blackley Jackson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Molly Blackley Jackson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Molly Blackley Jackson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Molly Blackley Jackson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Molly Blackley Jackson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Molly Blackley Jackson. The network helps show where Molly Blackley Jackson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Molly Blackley Jackson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Molly Blackley Jackson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Molly Blackley Jackson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Molly Blackley Jackson. Molly Blackley Jackson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 11 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 55 | |
| 11 | 43 | |
| 12 | 0 |
About Molly Blackley Jackson
Molly Blackley Jackson is a scholar working on Research and Theory, Family Practice and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 12 papers that have together received 242 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (7 papers), Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (4 papers) and Nursing education and management (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (64 citations), Research and Theory (15 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (179 citations). Molly Blackley Jackson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marjorie D. Wenrich, Ineke H. A. P. Wolfhagen, Paul G. Ramsey, Erika A. Goldstein, Albert Scherpbier, Albert Scherpbier, Lynne Robins, Doug Schaad, Susan E. Merel and Marwa Shoeb. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of General Internal Medicine, Academic Medicine and BMC Medical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.