Marwa Shoeb
About
In The Last Decade
Marwa Shoeb
8 papers receiving 683 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- General Health Professions 201
- Clinical Psychology 194
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 158
- Emergency Medicine 99
- Internal Medicine 77
Countries citing papers authored by Marwa Shoeb
This map shows the geographic impact of Marwa Shoeb's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marwa Shoeb with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marwa Shoeb more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marwa Shoeb
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marwa Shoeb. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marwa Shoeb. The network helps show where Marwa Shoeb may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Marwa Shoeb
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Marwa Shoeb. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Marwa Shoeb based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Marwa Shoeb. Marwa Shoeb is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 154 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 193 | |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 200 | |
| 8 | 124 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.