Ming‐Hong Tsai
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Maia J. YoungNorman P. LiCorinne BenderskyLarissa Z. TiedensKatherine A. ValentineAndrea L. MeltzerSheng-Tun LiChinho Lin
- Topics
- Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers)Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers)Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEOrganization Science
- Partner nations
- SingaporeUnited StatesTaiwan
In The Last Decade
Ming‐Hong Tsai
23 papers receiving 277 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Social Psychology 115
- Sociology and Political Science 95
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 67
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 42
- Cognitive Neuroscience 37
Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Hong Tsai
This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Hong Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Hong Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Hong Tsai more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Hong Tsai
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Hong Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Hong Tsai. The network helps show where Ming‐Hong Tsai may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming‐Hong Tsai
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming‐Hong Tsai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming‐Hong Tsai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming‐Hong Tsai. Ming‐Hong Tsai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 37 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Information Sharing within groups | 1 |
| 15 | Mad enough to see the other side: The effect of anger on hypothesis disconfirmation | 2 |
| 16 | 41 | |
| 17 | Mad Enough to See the Other Side: Anger and the Confirmation Bias | 0 |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 3 |
About Ming‐Hong Tsai
Ming‐Hong Tsai is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Social Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 297 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (22 citations), Applied Psychology (31 citations) and Social Psychology (115 citations). Ming‐Hong Tsai has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Maia J. Young, Norman P. Li, Corinne Bendersky, Larissa Z. Tiedens, Katherine A. Valentine, Andrea L. Meltzer, Sheng-Tun Li, Chinho Lin, O Jiaqing and Shu‐Cheng Steve. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Organization Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.