Ming‐Hong Tsai

443 total citations
27 papers, 297 citations indexed

About

Ming‐Hong Tsai is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ming‐Hong Tsai has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 297 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 14 papers in Social Psychology and 6 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ming‐Hong Tsai's work include Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers). Ming‐Hong Tsai is often cited by papers focused on Social and Intergroup Psychology (9 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers) and Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (4 papers). Ming‐Hong Tsai collaborates with scholars based in Singapore, United States and Taiwan. Ming‐Hong Tsai's co-authors include Maia J. Young, Norman P. Li, Corinne Bendersky, Larissa Z. Tiedens, Katherine A. Valentine, Andrea L. Meltzer, Sheng-Tun Li, Chinho Lin, O Jiaqing and Shu‐Cheng Steve and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Organization Science.

In The Last Decade

Ming‐Hong Tsai

23 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ming‐Hong Tsai Singapore 9 115 95 67 42 37 27 297
Mary Lynn Miller Henningsen United States 10 151 1.3× 152 1.6× 54 0.8× 26 0.6× 16 0.4× 31 341
Beth A. Pontari United States 9 161 1.4× 185 1.9× 53 0.8× 39 0.9× 48 1.3× 14 363
Jan Francis‐Smythe United Kingdom 10 78 0.7× 51 0.5× 60 0.9× 108 2.6× 21 0.6× 27 327
Dalia L. Diab United States 8 127 1.1× 105 1.1× 45 0.7× 109 2.6× 39 1.1× 14 412
Mirjam Tuk Netherlands 10 56 0.5× 179 1.9× 48 0.7× 70 1.7× 40 1.1× 21 355
Ellie Kyung United States 10 73 0.6× 101 1.1× 29 0.4× 33 0.8× 43 1.2× 19 293
Matthijs Poppe Netherlands 12 139 1.2× 231 2.4× 28 0.4× 56 1.3× 38 1.0× 18 372
Alexander Jordan Denmark 7 136 1.2× 165 1.7× 25 0.4× 61 1.5× 73 2.0× 17 368
Melanie Brucks United States 5 95 0.8× 94 1.0× 54 0.8× 21 0.5× 16 0.4× 8 310
Adi Amit Israel 9 160 1.4× 199 2.1× 25 0.4× 62 1.5× 41 1.1× 21 372

Countries citing papers authored by Ming‐Hong Tsai

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ming‐Hong Tsai's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ming‐Hong Tsai with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ming‐Hong Tsai more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ming‐Hong Tsai

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ming‐Hong Tsai. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ming‐Hong Tsai. The network helps show where Ming‐Hong Tsai may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ming‐Hong Tsai

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ming‐Hong Tsai. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ming‐Hong Tsai based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ming‐Hong Tsai. Ming‐Hong Tsai is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong. (2024). Does relationship conflict reduce novel idea communication through perceived leader openness? Power distance orientation as a moderator. International Journal of Conflict Management. 35(5). 1014–1033. 2 indexed citations
2.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong & Verlin B. Hinsz. (2023). Gain-loss domain and social value orientation as determinants of risk allocation decisions. Thinking & Reasoning. 30(2). 356–378.
3.
4.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong. (2022). Can conflict cultivate collaboration? The positive impact of mild versus intense task conflict via perceived openness rather than emotions.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied. 29(4). 813–830. 4 indexed citations
5.
Li, Norman P., et al.. (2020). Confidence is sexy and it can be trained: Examining male social confidence in initial, opposite‐sex interactions. Journal of Personality. 88(6). 1235–1251. 6 indexed citations
6.
Valentine, Katherine A., Norman P. Li, Andrea L. Meltzer, & Ming‐Hong Tsai. (2019). Mate Preferences for Warmth-Trustworthiness Predict Romantic Attraction in the Early Stages of Mate Selection and Satisfaction in Ongoing Relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 46(2). 298–311. 33 indexed citations
7.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong & Norman P. Li. (2019). Depletion manipulations decrease openness to dissent via increased anger. British Journal of Psychology. 111(2). 246–274. 8 indexed citations
8.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong, et al.. (2019). Restructured frame‐of‐reference training improves rating accuracy. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 40(6). 740–757. 2 indexed citations
9.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong, et al.. (2019). The Effects of Perceived Decision-Making Styles on Evaluations of Openness and Competence That Elicit Collaboration. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 46(1). 124–139. 7 indexed citations
10.
Leung, Angela K.‐Y., et al.. (2018). Mood—Creativity Relationship in Groups: The Role of Equality in Idea Contribution in Temporal Mood Effects. The Journal of Creative Behavior. 54(1). 165–183. 2 indexed citations
11.
Li, Norman P., et al.. (2015). Too Materialistic to Get Married and Have Children?. PLoS ONE. 10(5). e0126543–e0126543. 24 indexed citations
12.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong. (2015). A Leader's Decision Vigilance and Subordinates' Creativity: Creativity Requirement as a Mediator. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 10057–10057.
13.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong & Corinne Bendersky. (2015). The Pursuit of Information Sharing: Expressing Task Conflicts as Debates vs. Disagreements Increases Perceived Receptivity to Dissenting Opinions in Groups. Organization Science. 27(1). 141–156. 37 indexed citations
14.
Fulmer, Ashley, Ming‐Hong Tsai, & Nitya Chawla. (2015). Making or Breaking Team Creativity: Trust in Teams and Member Relational Orientation. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2015(1). 12388–12388. 1 indexed citations
15.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong, et al.. (2013). Transient IR-Drop Analysis for At-Speed Testing Using Representative Random Walk. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems. 22(9). 1980–1989. 6 indexed citations
16.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong. (2012). Information Sharing within groups. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 1 indexed citations
17.
Tiedens, Larissa Z., et al.. (2011). Mad enough to see the other side: The effect of anger on hypothesis disconfirmation. 2 indexed citations
18.
Young, Maia J., et al.. (2009). Mad Enough to See the Other Side: Anger and the Confirmation Bias. SSRN Electronic Journal.
19.
Tsai, Ming‐Hong, et al.. (2009). Salespeople’s Renqing Orientation, Self-esteem, and Selling Behaviors: An Empirical Study in Taiwan. Journal of Business and Psychology. 24(2). 193–200. 14 indexed citations
20.
Chi, Shu‐Cheng, et al.. (2004). THE EFFECTS OF PERCEIVED IDENTITY AND JUSTICE EXPERIENCES WITH AN ADR INSTITUTION ON MANAGERS' DECISION PREFERENCES. International Journal of Conflict Management. 15(1). 57–76. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mary Lynn Miller Henningsen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Beth A. Pontari Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jan Francis‐Smythe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dalia L. Diab Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Mirjam Tuk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ellie Kyung Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Matthijs Poppe Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Alexander Jordan Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Melanie Brucks Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Adi Amit
Rankless by CCL
2026