Minchi C. Kim

842 total citations
9 papers, 566 citations indexed

About

Minchi C. Kim is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Minchi C. Kim has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 566 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 6 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Minchi C. Kim's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (2 papers). Minchi C. Kim is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (6 papers), Online and Blended Learning (4 papers) and Education and Technology Integration (2 papers). Minchi C. Kim collaborates with scholars based in United States. Minchi C. Kim's co-authors include Michael J. Hannafin, Lynn A. Bryan, Hyeonjin Kim and Adrie A. Koehler and has published in prestigious journals such as Computers & Education, Science Education and Instructional Science.

In The Last Decade

Minchi C. Kim

9 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Minchi C. Kim United States	7	382	304	118	90	31	9	566
Tiffany A. Koszalka United States	13	409 1.1×	213 0.7×	101 0.9×	138 1.5×	20 0.6×	50	610
Paul Gruba Australia	16	241 0.6×	189 0.6×	63 0.5×	111 1.2×	26 0.8×	57	668
Kiran Lata Dangwal India	6	436 1.1×	148 0.5×	81 0.7×	143 1.6×	37 1.2×	21	622
Mahnaz Moallem United States	10	444 1.2×	204 0.7×	87 0.7×	68 0.8×	17 0.5×	36	612
Edys Quellmalz United States	13	452 1.2×	283 0.9×	109 0.9×	106 1.2×	75 2.4×	34	705
Gayle V. Davidson-Shivers United States	13	320 0.8×	220 0.7×	78 0.7×	73 0.8×	25 0.8×	31	487
Mai Neo Malaysia	14	345 0.9×	159 0.5×	89 0.8×	157 1.7×	52 1.7×	57	556
Kati Mäkitalo Finland	11	314 0.8×	192 0.6×	95 0.8×	108 1.2×	22 0.7×	14	525
Fu‐Yun Yu Taiwan	15	564 1.5×	451 1.5×	126 1.1×	108 1.2×	64 2.1×	55	781
Desirée Joosten-ten Brinke Netherlands	14	411 1.1×	150 0.5×	82 0.7×	76 0.8×	26 0.8×	40	591

Countries citing papers authored by Minchi C. Kim

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Minchi C. Kim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Minchi C. Kim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Minchi C. Kim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Minchi C. Kim

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Minchi C. Kim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Minchi C. Kim. The network helps show where Minchi C. Kim may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Minchi C. Kim

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Minchi C. Kim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Minchi C. Kim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Minchi C. Kim. Minchi C. Kim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Kim, Minchi C.. (2012). Revisiting cognitive tools: Shifting the focus to tools-in-use. Educational Technology archive. 52(4). 14–24. 8 indexed citations

2.

Koehler, Adrie A. & Minchi C. Kim. (2012). Improving Beginning Teacher Induction Programs through Distance Education. DergiPark (Istanbul University). 2 indexed citations

3.

Koehler, Adrie A. & Minchi C. Kim. (2012). Improving Beginning Teacher Induction Programs through Distance Education. Contemporary Educational Technology. 3(3). 8 indexed citations

4.

Kim, Minchi C., et al.. (2011). Technology Integration in Science Classrooms: Framework, Principles, and Examples.. Educational Technology archive. 51(1). 25–29. 2 indexed citations

5.

Kim, Minchi C. & Michael J. Hannafin. (2010). Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice. Computers & Education. 56(2). 403–417. 309 indexed citations

6.

Kim, Minchi C. & Michael J. Hannafin. (2010). Scaffolding 6th graders’ problem solving in technology-enhanced science classrooms: a qualitative case study. Instructional Science. 39(3). 255–282. 64 indexed citations

7.

Kim, Minchi C., Michael J. Hannafin, & Lynn A. Bryan. (2007). Technology‐enhanced inquiry tools in science education: An emerging pedagogical framework for classroom practice. Science Education. 91(6). 1010–1030. 122 indexed citations

8.

Hannafin, Michael J., Minchi C. Kim, & Hyeonjin Kim. (2004). Reconciling research, theory, and practice in web-based teaching and learning: The case for grounded design. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 15(2). 3–20. 18 indexed citations

9.

Hannafin, Michael J. & Minchi C. Kim. (2003). In search of a future: A critical analysis of research on web-based teaching and learning. Instructional Science. 31(4-5). 347–351. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact