Michelle C. Haynes
- Gender Studies top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Social Psychology
- Topics
- Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers)Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers)Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied PsychologyPersonality and Social Psychology BulletinJournal of General Internal Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandChina
In The Last Decade
Michelle C. Haynes
10 papers receiving 376 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
- Gender Studies 225
- Sociology and Political Science 167
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 98
- General Health Professions 52
- Social Psychology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Michelle C. Haynes
This map shows the geographic impact of Michelle C. Haynes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michelle C. Haynes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michelle C. Haynes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michelle C. Haynes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michelle C. Haynes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michelle C. Haynes. The network helps show where Michelle C. Haynes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michelle C. Haynes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michelle C. Haynes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michelle C. Haynes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michelle C. Haynes. Michelle C. Haynes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The relationship of prejudicial attitudes to psychological, social, and physical well-being within a sample of college students in the United States. | 13 |
| 2 | 37 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 32 | |
| 5 | In the Eye of the Beholder: Perceptions of the Centrality of Merit in Affirmative Action and Its Psychological Implications | 1 |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 242 | |
| 8 | Combating organizational discrimination: Some unintended consequences | 5 |
| 9 | 42 | |
| 10 | 23 |
About Michelle C. Haynes
Michelle C. Haynes is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Administration and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 10 papers that have together received 409 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Diversity and Inequality (6 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (3 papers) and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (225 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (98 citations) and Safety Research (35 citations). Michelle C. Haynes has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and China. Frequent co-authors include Madeline E. Heilman, Meg A. Bond, Sally W. Vernon, Evelyn Chan, Chul Ahn, Ivy K. Ho and Khanh T. Dinh. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of General Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.