Michele Andreaus

18 papers receiving 394 citations

Peers

Michele Andreaus
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Business and International Management 40
  • Strategy and Management 251
  • Marketing 147
  • Public Administration 43
  • Management Information Systems 55
Replace Katharina Spraul with:
Katharina Spraul Germany
Lara Bianchi United Kingdom
Bimal Arora United Kingdom
Cletus Agyenim‐Boateng Ghana
Horacio Enrique Rousseau United States
Eduardo Ordonez‐Ponce Canada
Stephen Frost Hong Kong
Adrian Henriques Brazil
David Hitchens United Kingdom
Patricia Kanashiro United States
Michele Andreaus relative to Katharina Spraul Germany Katharina Spraul's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×1.8×
Katharina Spraul · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michele Andreaus

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michele Andreaus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michele Andreaus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michele Andreaus more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michele Andreaus

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michele Andreaus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michele Andreaus. The network helps show where Michele Andreaus may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michele Andreaus, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michele Andreaus Line = papers co-authored together Michele Andreaus links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2020159
2 201157
3 202036
4 201832
5 201228
6 201925
7 202117
8 202212
9 201812
10 20148
11 20126
12 20235
13 20225
14 20184
15 20113
16 20122
17 20121
18 20141
19 20160
20 20230

About Michele Andreaus

Michele Andreaus is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Political Science and International Relations and Marketing, having authored 20 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering (5 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (4 papers), Community Development and Social Impact (3 papers), Cooperative Studies and Economics (3 papers), Management, Economics, and Public Policy (2 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (2 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers) and Family Business Performance and Succession (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (40 citations), Strategy and Management (251 citations), Marketing (147 citations), Public Administration (43 citations) and Management Information Systems (55 citations). Michele Andreaus has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ericka Costa, Jesús Valero‐Gil, José Mariano Moneva Abadía, Sabina Scarpellini, Caterina Pesci, Tommaso Ramus, Emanuele Taufer, Maurizio Carpita, Thomas Schneider and Leonardo Rinaldi. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting & Financial Management, Sustainability Accounting Management and Policy Journal, Service Business, VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations and Accounting History.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact