Countries where authors publish in Accounting History
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Accounting History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Accounting History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Accounting History more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers published in Accounting History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Accounting History.
About Accounting History
The 594 papers published in Accounting History in the last decades have received a total of 6.8k indexed citations . Papers published in Accounting History usually cover Management Information Systems (382 papers), Accounting (219 papers) and Public Administration (44 papers) specifically the topics of Accounting and Organizational Management (380 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (180 papers), Accounting Education and Careers (97 papers), Public Policy and Administration Research (41 papers), Historical Economic and Social Studies (32 papers), Corporate Finance and Governance (26 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (16 papers) and Management and Organizational Studies (16 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Accounting History are Christopher J. Napier, Delfina Gomes, Salvador Carmona, Lee D. Parker, Massimo Sargiacomo, Brian West, Carolyn Cordery, Thomas N. Tyson, Garry D. Carnegie and Jayne Bisman.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.